[gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:56:39 -0800
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:48:59AM +0200, Paul Kellett wrote:
> Both of these twist the original intentions of VST a bit, but it's
> possible to meet the user's expectations with just "save complete state"
> and "save current patch", leaving it up to the plug-in what actually gets
> saved.
I'm just going to bed, so I'll have a think on it. I'm sure that I'll wake
up to a bunch of messages ;)
> > My opinion is that multi-timbrality doesn't belong in the virtual world.
> > I'd rather see N instances of a plugin for N channels.
>
> I tend to agree, but users that want a GM plug-in will think they are
> making a pretty reasonable request.
Can we find a better way of making it taste the same without being the same?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
