[gmpi] Re: 3.11 Parameters
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:13:05 +0100
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 08:54:16 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > I dont think so - it sounds very compicated when you could just declare it
> > as N different plugins, which share common code. It places a lot of
> > complexity in the hosts instantiation code and plugins that use it. It
> > also looses oportunities for optimisation in the compiler, eg. fixed loop
> > unrolling if you use it.
>
> I agree with all this as the flip-side. I could be talked out of it ;) We
> almost have to support dynamic I/O though. Too many existing APIs do it to
> not handle it, I think.
Dynamic i/o connection, or dynamic i/o creation?
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
