Philip M I'm back in teal again. Paul I think you got it, but you blinded me with possibilities.. If we just find one anomaly then science should be honest enough to deal with it.. But of course. People who work in science are first and before anything else -- curious. And to top that off, they also suffer the normal human frailties including egotism -- if there is a choice they'd rather it was them than someone else who makes that possible discovery, either new ground or upsetting the old apple-cart. When I worked in testing prototypes of new equipment, I was always on the look out for errors and I found a few. Certain people would get upset when you found fault, but those who were interested in the product succeeding in the market place were pleased. Same deal. I think what RB said re the LRRR reflector, might have given the answer, thats if it is real, and NASA does not seem to have acknowledged the point Robert raised.. Perhaps they don't know .. I do not see anyone of them buying a book from nutty bible believing geocentrists ... Would you clarify the point you mean here for my benefit please? I can't identify it. Same as they keep quiet about the pendulum anomaly during an eclipse.. Even though they have acknowledged it they cant answer it. But Philip you can read up on the results of these experiments. They do get mentioned in the evening news broadcasts for instance -- that's where I first heard about it! OK it's not yet explained, but it will not be if it isn't addressed. And you can bet there are people out there just itching for the next eclipse to arrive. I know I am. Philip Paul D ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage on all webmail accounts. http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html