[geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:43:10 +0100
Dear Paul,
I'm not doubting what is said; its just that I thought that elliptical
planetary orbits were a device to explain a heliocentric cosmos. Could Neville
perhaps help here?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 8:24 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
Jack L
Why. I don't know. But it is accurately described by Kepler and Newton.
How. If you shoot a rocket off in the right direction at the right velocity
and track its progress, you'll find it is an ellipse. The space agencies of the
world rely upon it and it works. Plus of course, all orbits are found to be
ellipses if you can accept that the universe operates according to rules ("God
doesn't play dice") and that the Earth also moves in an ellipse. If you can't
accept this, then I have no answer for you and neither does anyone else.
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, 18 July, 2007 5:41:56 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
Dear Paul,
Why is the transfer orbit elliptical and how do we know this? In other words
can this be worked out experimentally?
Jack
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage on
all webmail accounts. Find out more.
Other related posts:
