[geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:15:52 -0700 (PDT)

I think we are not as far apart as your conclusions might at first suggest, 
with a little "tweaking"  .......... It is/could be possible to 
explain/describe a localized only gravitational effect who?s ultimate cause is 
still "universal"... In this way there would be no need to through out 
instantaneous action at a distance or deep space travel or inertia as 
classically defined.(how it is described not explained)
   
   
  A "Gravitational wake" is the feed back inherent in the effect that the 
gravitational vibration in the aether has on a given body, which in turn feeds 
back in to the aether as a disruption in the aether itself due to the size and 
mass of the object.....ie...A spinning body resist change in orientation 
(gyroscope effect or an ethereal disturbance feed back) the Aspeden motor ( 
requires less energy to restart ...ethereal feedback ) the feed back that the 
vibration acting on a body and in turn that bodies reaction to it feed back 
into the aether itself is the bodies gravitational wake..or the area where the 
body, gravity vibration and aether directly interact as a function of each 
other.This localised area creates a localised attraction akin to surface 
tenstion of a body in water(aether)
   
  When smaller objects come into a larger objects Gravitational "wake" in the 
aether something akin to surface tension is manifested and the smaller object 
is then attracted to the larger one. Outside of a gravitation wake of larger 
objects the very small objects will exhibit there own Grav Feild but much 
diminished do to the fact that size is the determining factor for attraction 
and the rate of attraction between any two bodies. Any free body such as a 
satellite at 31,000 Km is not in the gravitational wake of the earth. 
   
   This might be akin to the area immediately in which a ship water and its 
motion are directly interacting ..even though the ship is in the same ocean 
there is a point beyond which that interaction cannot be perceived by the rest 
of the ocean or ocean going vessels.... Beyond this area(wake) only normal grav 
wave action exist on any free body in the same way that a large ship and a 
small row boat might interact in terms of the large ships wake or surface 
tension if it begins to sink...small near objects will get pulled down into the 
sinking ships wake. This is the immediate area where the ship(planet) 
water(aether medium) and the small rowboat or floating trash ( satellite) are 
all interacting but only in the immediate area of the wake ..In that sense this 
interacting feedback would be a local phenomena only even though gravity or the 
motion though the water (aether) would itself be universal .........We might be 
looking at the prime force the vibration itself as gravity
 but also a secondary effect that the vibration has on the objects themselves 
as they attempt to feed back into the aether in the immediate area and that 
would be akin to a kind of surface tension.....The zero fields net effect in GS 
orbit is due to the insignificant size of the objects own wake in relation to 
the wake of other bodies, such that the two will never directly interact. 
However much larger bodies will be affected more directly due to the fact that 
in vibrational phenomena there is asymmetry in the way that larger objects of a 
given magnitude are acted upon compared to those of lesser magnitude. In 
essence the larger objects are going to be more directly affected (visa v tuned 
to)by the gravitational wave propagating through the aether then the smaller 
ones except when the small ones come into or near the gravitational wake of the 
larger ones. 
   
  The gravitational vibration in the aether tuned to those larger bodies is 
what would create the overall distribution of matter in the universe on 
concentric shells. Much in the same what thae coils tuned to each other can 
transmit receive energy over distance and ones that are not tuned to the 
resonate frequency cannot receive the energy transmission..(last weeks NS on 
wirless recharging for cell phones) 
  

Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    All,

The geosynchronous satellites paper is now back up on the web site, enhanced 
with more diagrams and with better Artemis references than just Kramer. Those 
of you with a previous copy will need to reprint the whole thing.

Navigate to 

www.geocentricperspective.com

Science -> Physics -> Geosynchronous satellites in a geostationary universe

Best wishes,

Neville. 
  
---------------------------------
    Listen & Record Music from Internet Radio - Get Free Radio & MP3 Player & 
Recorder
Learn more at www.inbox.com/radio

Other related posts: