In message <dXwNs6C5J3zKFwZq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> David Pilling <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In message <754da0a750.farmstay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ross > McGuinness <farmstay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes >>process. Each of them have jpegs of more than 1Mb. The one that the >>document fell over on had a digital image from a camera with a size >>of over 4Mb > A 4MB JPEG is going to turn into a very large image when it is expanded > - you tell me width x height pixels. Even so I would have thought you'd > get away with it. It seems that it is necessary to keep a close eye on the image size (data in Mb) and to use !ChangeFSI to keep size down. Thanks for all the help with this problem. Ross > A critical factor is if the JPEG needs colour processing, if it does not > then it is sent straight to RISC OS and components of that may run out > of memory. Otherwise one looks to Ovation Pro. > I always fancied the idea of adding a feature to OP that would re-sample > images to the necessary resolution. > Difficult calculation to do mentally because printer resolution may be > much higher than the screen, but then effectively reduced by the need to > use half toning. -- Ross and Bev McGuinness, Cinnamon Coloureds Farmstay 1800 South Coast Hwy DENMARK WA 6333 Tel:+61 8 9848 1781 Fax:+61 8 9848 1231 Web: http://www.denmarkwa.com.au/cc/ To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: //www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling