[channelf] Re: assembler
- From: Kevin Lipe <kevin.lipe@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: channelf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:21:01 -0500
definitely. I think whatever we do in terms of an assembler should be
done as a consensus thing so we don't have everyone using different
assemblers and thus having different directives in the source code...
save for the face that we dont know what assembler Sean is using for
Lights Out... Sean?
~ kevin
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:18:53 +0200, Thomas Mathys <mathys66@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hello
>
> hmm, i contacted andrew aswell, yesterday, after he wrote on atariage
> people interested in retargeting dasm should contact him.
>
> well, i had a short look at the dasm source code. it could be difficult to
> adapt dasm. it exploits the fact that all the cpus it supports so far have
> opcodes with very similar addressing modes, and the syntax of the assembly
> language is the same aswell.
>
> whatever, we should make sure work doesn't get done twice...
>
> cheers
> thomas
>
> >Sure don't, I got them from Sean Riddle's site. Thanks for offering
> >though... and now I'm talking with Andrew Davie, the official
> >Kevin
>
>
Other related posts:
