[channelf] Re: assembler
- From: Kevin Lipe <kevin.lipe@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: channelf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:41:17 -0500
It works excellently. I'll start working on the routines for my first
Channel F demo, then... hopefully this won't be too ridiculously hard.
kevin
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:40:27 +0200, Thomas Mathys <mathys66@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Couldn't one just use the .byte DASM directive in the place of .db?
> >They look like the same thing... I know it'd break compatibility
> >between DASM and f8tool but... it's the conventional way of working
> >with byte of raw data for Atari programmers, and it works just the
> >same.
>
> oh, you still can use them, it's not like they're gone away. personally
> i'll be happy about db and the likes, since as an old turbo assembler and
> nasm user i still occasionally try to use them. dasm supports already 9 or
> so data definition directives, so another 3 won't hurt =)
>
> i sent a mail yesterday that contained dasm as an attachment, but
> apparently it didn't get through:
> www.zhwin.ch/~mathytho/dasm.zip
> the archive contains dasm and lights.asm, modified to assemble with dasm
> (see at the top of the file for changes that were necessary).
>
> there are a few minor things i'd like to fix, but basically it's now useable.
> (dasm's expression evaluator is a bit broken. it doesn't allow parentheses
> in expressions that are part of a mnemonic, since parentheses denote
> indirect addressing on the 6502. i can fix that at least for the f8)
>
> cheers
> thomas
>
>
Other related posts:
