[bookport] Re: speech
- From: "DOC" <TALMIDIM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:41:36 -0700
Yes, I like att natural voices but sheesh what a memory hog
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grant Hardy" <granthardy@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:54 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: speech
> I'm all for having the ATNT natural voices. Those should work perfectly
on
> the current units!
>
> Only kidding. I'd go for eloquence though.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:35 PM
> Subject: [bookport] speech
>
>
> > Since we're talking about the new unit, speech might be worth
discussing.
> > My
> > vote would be for doubletalk or eloquence. Of course, everyone has their
> > favorites, and there's no way you're going to please everyone, but
that's
> > my
> > vote. Perhaps the new units could have 2 speech engines like the
> > braillenotes do
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
