[bookport] Re: speech
- From: "Sarah Heesen" <sarahheesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 21:35:00 -0600
Some of those speech options will probably eat up a lot of battery power
too.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David Bennett
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:32 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: speech
Just remember that the better the speech, the higher will be the cost. I'd
love to have eloquence, but it's one of the more costly ways to go.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sue" <sjfryer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:19 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: speech
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm with you, mate. I think Eloquence would be a great idea.
>
> Sue.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:35 AM
> Subject: [bookport] speech
>
>
>> Since we're talking about the new unit, speech might be worth discussing.
>> My
>> vote would be for doubletalk or eloquence. Of course, everyone has their
>> favorites, and there's no way you're going to please everyone, but that's
>> my
>> vote. Perhaps the new units could have 2 speech engines like the
>> braillenotes do
>>
>
>
>
>
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/252 - Release Date: 2/6/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/252 - Release Date: 2/6/2006
Other related posts: