[bookport] Re: speech

  • From: "David Bennett" <david382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 21:31:38 -0600

Just remember that the better the speech, the higher will be the cost. I'd love to have eloquence, but it's one of the more costly ways to go.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue" <sjfryer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:19 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: speech



       Hi Mike,

I'm with you, mate.   I think Eloquence would be a great idea.

Sue.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Arrigo" <n0oxy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:35 AM
Subject: [bookport] speech



Since we're talking about the new unit, speech might be worth discussing. My
vote would be for doubletalk or eloquence. Of course, everyone has their
favorites, and there's no way you're going to please everyone, but that's my
vote. Perhaps the new units could have 2 speech engines like the
braillenotes do









Other related posts: