[blind-democracy] Re: for Carl, Atheism

  • From: Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:43:15 -0400

Oh no, I did what you do. I googled it after writing my definition and the
results are in two posts of mine and Google agrees with me!

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of R. E. Driscoll Sr
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:15 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: for Carl, Atheism


Miriam:
The correct definition (in your opinion and experience) being your comment
in the following paragraph. However, Carl is on a different wave length
than you and he expresses his opinion (based upon his opinion and
experience).
Pax vobiscum.
R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr.


On 7/20/2015 4:59 PM, Miriam Vieni wrote:


I have no problem with Carl's position on God. I just want him to
use the
correct definition of his position. But, as he has so clearly
indicated to
me, he and I are equally stubborn. It has something to do with our
ages, I
suppose.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of R. E.
Driscoll Sr
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 5:38 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: for Carl, Atheism


All:
Why worry. Carl is comfortable with his concept of God and His
creation. I
am comfortable with his holding that idea and wish him luck.
R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr.


On 7/20/2015 2:35 PM, Miriam Vieni wrote:


Chuck,

It's been a long running discussion. Carl insists that God
is a
concept made
up by man, but he also insists that he's an agnostic. Roger
and I
have been
telling him, perhaps for more than a year, that he's an
atheist.

Miriam

-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Charles
Krugman
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 3:08 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: for Carl, Atheism

As a hard-core atheist I would agree with this definition. I
just
happened
to catch this message as I am way behind in emails so I
haven't been
following much lately. An Agnostic is someone who in simple
terms
doesn't
know whether there is a god or any other deities or who
doesn't want
to
commit to such a statement. I will have to go back and try
to find
Carl's
original post. Arm out of sling as of doctor's appointment
today so
I may be
more regular again on the computer.
Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Vieni
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 9:57 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] for Carl, Atheism

from Google

Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it
is a lack
of
belief in gods. Older dictionaries define atheism as "a
belief that
there is
no God."


Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the
existence of
deities.[1][2] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically
the
position
that there are no deities.inclusively, atheism is the
absence of
belief that
any deities exist.[ It seems to me that this describes your
belief.
That is
why I say that you are not an agnostic.

Miriam












________________________________

Avast logo <http://www.avast.com/> <http://www.avast.com/> This
email has been checked for
viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/> <http://www.avast.com/>











________________________________

Avast logo <http://www.avast.com/> This email has been checked for
viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>





Other related posts: