Hi, Paula! I do the same thing. <Smile> I'm glad that I was able to experience the Optacon, and I too occasionally wish I had one when I need to read something that won't scan even halfway correctly! Jana ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paula Muysenberg" <outofsightlife@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:18 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: about braille > I used to use an optacon, too. I wish mine still worked, as it would be > handy for checking books that don't scan properly, rather than waiting until > a sighted family member is available. When I visualize words, I sometimes > picture them partly in braille and partly in print, because of having used > an optacon. > > Regards, > Paula > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Donna Smith" <donnafsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:48 AM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: about braille > > > > When I convert language into written words in my brain, it's always in > > braille, though I can convert it to print if I make a conscious effort to > do > > it. Even when I use to read with the Opticon, (I know, that means I'm > > slightly older than Shelley's 23 years, <grin>), which had to be read one > > print letter at a time, I had to convert those letters into braille in my > > brain in order to put together the final word. It is also the method I use > > to remember phone numbers...visualizing them written in braille. > > > > I also find it very difficult to explain in words how I visualize objects > or > > mental maps or people or exactly how I experience dreams. That is, I have > > no trouble describing events around these things such as what the dream > was > > about, but when people ask me about the images in my dreams, or what I > > process from detailed descriptions of things around me that are larger > than > > I can reach, such as descriptions of a mountain view or particular > > architecture, I have trouble giving explanations that are understandable. > > It's like my frame of reference is different and I lost the ability to > > describe it because it wasn't understood by others. Still, when a > person's > > name is mentioned, I get a mental image of that person, and it's > > disconcerting for me as a very verbal person, not to be able to explain > it. > > > > This is a very fascinating discussion and I'm glad that we're having it > even > > though we're deviating from the topic of books for the collection. But > then > > after the discussion of lascivious hardware and blueberries, I guess it's > no > > surprise that we're deviants! > > > > Peace and Hope, > > > > Donna, who really has no business being awake at this time of the morning! > > >