Bob Trussler: > We currently have two choices, shown below. Does anyone have support for > the modern way of using Arabic numbering throughout? I reckon that Roman > for front matter followed by Arabic for the content comes from the olden > days of hand publishing when the content was assembled THEN the Table of > Contents was assembled later, so why do we need to maintain this style? Your historical explanation is correct. It's also worth noting that magazines don't follow the old convention; pages are numbered in a single sequence. It might take a little getting used to (esp. for us older folks), but the separate numbering doesn't have a whole lot of justification any more. Michael Lewis -------------------------------------- Brandle Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia www.brandle.com.au -------------------------------------- ************************************************** To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field. To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. To search the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************