At random, I'd say that wb is not so important; especially if you want to process for the exact illumination in which you imaged the chart -a "situation profile' in which case you just choose a white balance and lock it down for ulterior uses of the profile. Edmund On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Jul 6, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Maciej Bryński <maciek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I can manually approximate correct WB. But is there a method to count > > it exactly ? > > Yes and no. > > You can precisely normalize white balance and exposure both by building a > profile of a UNIWB gamma 1.0 development of the file; looking up D50 white > in said profile; and doing a bit of math on the resulting RGB values. > > The catch is twofold. > > First, I have no clue what sorts of math would be necessary to translate > into some white balance / tint slider positions; second is that I don't > even know if C1 offers the ability to do the kind of minimalist processing > you need. (Basically, you're looking for a file that's undergone > demosaicing and nothing else.) > > If you can't do it right, you can at least get pretty close by cranking > the saturation, fiddling with the sliders until it looks as least awful as > you can get, and returning the saturation back to normal. It helps to have > a synthetically-generated reference image on the same screen to compare > with. You'll also want to adjust the exposure slider so that the luminance > of neutral patches are as close a fit as possible, and you'll likely want > to bounce back and forth between adjusting white balance and luminance > until you reach a point of diminishing returns. > > Boosting saturation visually exaggerates color differences, especially of > those close to the neutral axis. An image whose white balance is even > slightly off will look really bad when you crank the saturation. If the > white balance is perfect, it'll just look very saturated. > > More details -- too many more details -- here: > > http://trumpetpower.com/photos/Exposure > > Cheers, > > b& >