[amayausers] Re: Lettering

  • From: "ice_man21" <ice_man21@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:35:36 -0500

Trade-in?
Seems to me everytime I asked my sales rep about trade-ins he said Melco
had no trade in program that it would be strictly up to me to sell on my
own. After I purchased my machine my rep was absolutely worthless. If
you really need to know the name ask me privately, but I am in the
northeast.

ice_man21@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

-----Original Message-----
From: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Body Cover
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 7:15 PM
To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering

We are thinking of trading in 2 of our older Amayas for 2 XT's 
My sales Rep said (don't hold me or her to this)
that with mine as a trade in they are $5500.00 each
which I didn't think was too bad to upgrade to the newest
system, and the facts that hats run better is something
to really look forward to.

Ron Vinyard
Body Cover / Magic Stitches

1-888-435-0176
541-471-1504 Fax 541-471-0427

420 SW H Street, Grants Pass, OR 97526-2532

info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.bodycoverdesign.com



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Linen Barn" <linen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 4:03 PM
Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering


> The cost of adding a machine can be less than your initial investment
cause 
> you already have the software but depends on if you have flex +,
otherwise 
> you may need an extra dongle or upgrade to flex+ for multiple machines
to 
> run seperate designs.  I am thinking of adding an XT after taxes and
am 
> looking at around $11K to add one.  I have flex+ with 3 amaya's right
now.
> 
> As far as your existing machine it will run the auto-actifeed and you
are 
> looking around $500 for the upgrade I think.  You can call your sales
person 
> and get some exact numbers.
> 
> Aaron Sargent
> The Linen Barn
> linen@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 541-770-2957
> Medford, OR
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "r.rinehartsr" <drader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 2:52 PM
> Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering
> 
> 
>> CAN THIS NEW OS SOFTWARE BE USED ON THE OLD AMAYA THAT I BOUGHT LAST
>> SEPTEMBER AND HOW MUCH DOES THE UPDATE COST.  I CAN'T BELIEVE THEY
ALREADY
>> HAVE A NEW MACHINE.  WAS IT A LOT MORE THAN $16,000 LIKE THE OLDER
MODEL?
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Lee & Barbara Ott" <digitalstitchz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:02 PM
>> Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering
>>
>>
>>> It was announced with the AMAYA XT.  In the newer versions of OS
software
>>> the machine senses the tension on the thread (by way of the sensor
for
>>> thread breaks) and feeds automatically the amount of thread needed.
>>>
>>> Lee and Barbara Ott
>>> Digital Stitchz
>>> Fairfield, CA
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: "Ruth Williams" <lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Reply-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering
>>>>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:26 -0800
>>>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([206.53.239.180]) by
>>>>bay0-mc5-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed,
>>>>15
>>>>Mar 2006 13:47:38 -0800
>>>>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by
turing.freelists.org
>>>>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C0C362BD193;Wed,
15 
>>>>Mar
>>>>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST)
>>>>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost
(turing
>>>>[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 13062-08; Wed,
15 Mar
>>>>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST)
>>>>Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org
>>>>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4CE272BCFA8;Wed,
15 
>>>>Mar
>>>>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST)
>>>>Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list amayausers); Wed, 15 Mar 2006
>>>>16:47:28
>>>>-0500 (EST)
>>>>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by
turing.freelists.org
>>>>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C48BB2BD13Afor
>>>><amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST)
>>>>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost
(turing
>>>>[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 13036-08 for
>>>><amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST)
>>>>Received: from mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net
(mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net
>>>>[63.231.195.113])by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail
>>>>Multiplex) with SMTP id 921082BCFA8for <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Wed, 
>>>>15
>>>>Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST)
>>>>Received: (qmail 92385 invoked by uid 0); 15 Mar 2006 21:47:28 -0000
>>>>Received: from unknown (63.231.195.2)  by
mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net 
>>>>with
>>>>QMQP; 15 Mar 2006 21:47:28 -0000
>>>>Received: from 71-33-125-113.spkn.qwest.net (HELO embroidery)
>>>>(71.33.125.113)  by mpls-pop-02.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 15 Mar
2006
>>>>21:47:27 -0000
>>>>X-Message-Info: yilqo4+6kc5lUbif9h7BDg+A+u15HOkq4V4Z8OlT5i0=
>>>>X-Original-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Delivered-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>References: <82.3834e39b.3149c0cd@xxxxxxx>
>>>><001a01c6486c$047fa5a0$5002a8c0@lisabusiness>
>>>><4D05D38A-3878-4D06-900A-7A93D8371A4D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
>>>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>>>>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at
avenirtech.net
>>>>X-archive-position: 8741
>>>>X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
>>>>Errors-To: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>X-original-sender: lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>Precedence: normal
>>>>X-list: amayausers
>>>>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at
avenirtech.net
>>>>Return-Path: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2006 21:47:39.0163 (UTC)
>>>>FILETIME=[145F2EB0:01C6487A]
>>>>
>>>>What is actifeed.  That's a term I haven't heard before.
>>>>
>>>>Ruth Williams  lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Roland R. Irish III" <signman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:13 PM
>>>>Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > The only (and last) batch of teeshirts we did had about 9,000
>>>> > stitches-a really 100% covered area-and it puckered so bad on the
>>>> > test we had to do double 3 oz...might as well just sewn a patch
and
>>>> > sewn that in place!
>>>> > But that was before the actifeed...so when I get bored some day
I'll
>>>> > run a test and see.
>>>> > So far I'm having good results with the actifeed on cheap fleece
>>>> > blankets, sweats, workjackets, nylon jackets, and totes...I feel
the
>>>> > actual sewn area is 'tighter' than without the actifeed, and we
see
>>>> > either no bobbin at all in the back, or lighter material the
bobbin
>>>> > is pulled right up through the front-no happy medium except hats
and
>>>> > heavy jackets and totes! Weird...and our bobbins are lasting
twice as
>>>> > long....using more thread instead.
>>>> > But it looks good, sews faster, and compared to before, almost no
>>>> > thread breaks.
>>>> >
>>>> > Roland
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 
> 
>

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.4/282 - Release Date: 3/15/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.4/282 - Release Date: 3/15/2006
 


Other related posts: