[amayausers] Re: Lettering
- From: "Linen Barn" <linen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:03:13 -0800
The cost of adding a machine can be less than your initial investment cause
you already have the software but depends on if you have flex +, otherwise
you may need an extra dongle or upgrade to flex+ for multiple machines to
run seperate designs. I am thinking of adding an XT after taxes and am
looking at around $11K to add one. I have flex+ with 3 amaya's right now.
As far as your existing machine it will run the auto-actifeed and you are
looking around $500 for the upgrade I think. You can call your sales person
and get some exact numbers.
Aaron Sargent
The Linen Barn
linen@xxxxxxxxxxx
541-770-2957
Medford, OR
----- Original Message -----
From: "r.rinehartsr" <drader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 2:52 PM
Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering
> CAN THIS NEW OS SOFTWARE BE USED ON THE OLD AMAYA THAT I BOUGHT LAST
> SEPTEMBER AND HOW MUCH DOES THE UPDATE COST. I CAN'T BELIEVE THEY ALREADY
> HAVE A NEW MACHINE. WAS IT A LOT MORE THAN $16,000 LIKE THE OLDER MODEL?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lee & Barbara Ott" <digitalstitchz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:02 PM
> Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering
>
>
>> It was announced with the AMAYA XT. In the newer versions of OS software
>> the machine senses the tension on the thread (by way of the sensor for
>> thread breaks) and feeds automatically the amount of thread needed.
>>
>> Lee and Barbara Ott
>> Digital Stitchz
>> Fairfield, CA
>>
>>
>>>From: "Ruth Williams" <lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>Reply-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering
>>>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:26 -0800
>>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([206.53.239.180]) by
>>>bay0-mc5-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed,
>>>15
>>>Mar 2006 13:47:38 -0800
>>>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org
>>>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C0C362BD193;Wed, 15
>>>Mar
>>>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST)
>>>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (turing
>>>[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 13062-08; Wed, 15 Mar
>>>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST)
>>>Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org
>>>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4CE272BCFA8;Wed, 15
>>>Mar
>>>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST)
>>>Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list amayausers); Wed, 15 Mar 2006
>>>16:47:28
>>>-0500 (EST)
>>>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org
>>>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C48BB2BD13Afor
>>><amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST)
>>>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (turing
>>>[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 13036-08 for
>>><amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST)
>>>Received: from mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net (mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net
>>>[63.231.195.113])by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail
>>>Multiplex) with SMTP id 921082BCFA8for <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,
>>>15
>>>Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST)
>>>Received: (qmail 92385 invoked by uid 0); 15 Mar 2006 21:47:28 -0000
>>>Received: from unknown (63.231.195.2) by mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net
>>>with
>>>QMQP; 15 Mar 2006 21:47:28 -0000
>>>Received: from 71-33-125-113.spkn.qwest.net (HELO embroidery)
>>>(71.33.125.113) by mpls-pop-02.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2006
>>>21:47:27 -0000
>>>X-Message-Info: yilqo4+6kc5lUbif9h7BDg+A+u15HOkq4V4Z8OlT5i0=
>>>X-Original-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Delivered-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>References: <82.3834e39b.3149c0cd@xxxxxxx>
>>><001a01c6486c$047fa5a0$5002a8c0@lisabusiness>
>>><4D05D38A-3878-4D06-900A-7A93D8371A4D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
>>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>>>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
>>>X-archive-position: 8741
>>>X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
>>>Errors-To: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>X-original-sender: lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx
>>>Precedence: normal
>>>X-list: amayausers
>>>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
>>>Return-Path: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2006 21:47:39.0163 (UTC)
>>>FILETIME=[145F2EB0:01C6487A]
>>>
>>>What is actifeed. That's a term I haven't heard before.
>>>
>>>Ruth Williams lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Roland R. Irish III" <signman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:13 PM
>>>Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering
>>>
>>>
>>> > The only (and last) batch of teeshirts we did had about 9,000
>>> > stitches-a really 100% covered area-and it puckered so bad on the
>>> > test we had to do double 3 oz...might as well just sewn a patch and
>>> > sewn that in place!
>>> > But that was before the actifeed...so when I get bored some day I'll
>>> > run a test and see.
>>> > So far I'm having good results with the actifeed on cheap fleece
>>> > blankets, sweats, workjackets, nylon jackets, and totes...I feel the
>>> > actual sewn area is 'tighter' than without the actifeed, and we see
>>> > either no bobbin at all in the back, or lighter material the bobbin
>>> > is pulled right up through the front-no happy medium except hats and
>>> > heavy jackets and totes! Weird...and our bobbins are lasting twice as
>>> > long....using more thread instead.
>>> > But it looks good, sews faster, and compared to before, almost no
>>> > thread breaks.
>>> >
>>> > Roland
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
