Yes, we have three AMAYA's that are not a year old. Got them in April, 2005. They as well as our new AMAYA XT all use the actifeed feature because it is a software only upgrade to get the actifeed. If you purchased you software less than a year ago you are able to get an update to the 2005 OS software and Design Shop. Lee and Barbara Ott Digital Stitchz Fairfield, CA >From: "r.rinehartsr" <drader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Reply-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering >Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:52:33 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from turing.freelists.org ([206.53.239.180]) by >bay0-mc12-f10.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, >15 Mar 2006 14:54:45 -0800 >Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org >(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id CF3EA2BCCB7;Wed, 15 Mar >2006 17:52:44 -0500 (EST) >Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (turing >[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 21650-04; Wed, 15 Mar >2006 17:52:44 -0500 (EST) >Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org >(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4E7152BCD77;Wed, 15 Mar >2006 17:52:44 -0500 (EST) >Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list amayausers); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:52:36 >-0500 (EST) >Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org >(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 043DD2BCAC0for ><amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:52:36 -0500 (EST) >Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (turing >[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 21638-01 for ><amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:52:35 -0500 (EST) >Received: from sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91.asp.att.net >[63.240.76.165])by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail >Multiplex) with ESMTP id B4A1B2BC6E0for <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 15 >Mar 2006 17:52:35 -0500 (EST) >Received: from BullsEye (12-205-55-172.client.insightbb.com[12.205.55.172]) > by sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91) with SMTP id ><20060315225224i9100ftl16e>; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:52:35 +0000 >X-Message-Info: yilqo4+6kc6Wa12x313EYvpRd5Yeta4gJernyKq0ld8= >X-Original-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Delivered-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >References: <BAY106-F146184A0F9867D14BECCE6DEE60@xxxxxxx> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 >X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net >X-archive-position: 8745 >X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 >Errors-To: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >X-original-sender: drader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Precedence: normal >X-list: amayausers >X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net >Return-Path: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2006 22:54:45.0468 (UTC) >FILETIME=[743C91C0:01C64883] > >CAN THIS NEW OS SOFTWARE BE USED ON THE OLD AMAYA THAT I BOUGHT LAST >SEPTEMBER AND HOW MUCH DOES THE UPDATE COST. I CAN'T BELIEVE THEY ALREADY >HAVE A NEW MACHINE. WAS IT A LOT MORE THAN $16,000 LIKE THE OLDER MODEL? >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Lee & Barbara Ott" <digitalstitchz@xxxxxxxxxxx> >To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:02 PM >Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering > > > > It was announced with the AMAYA XT. In the newer versions of OS >software > > the machine senses the tension on the thread (by way of the sensor for > > thread breaks) and feeds automatically the amount of thread needed. > > > > Lee and Barbara Ott > > Digital Stitchz > > Fairfield, CA > > > > > >>From: "Ruth Williams" <lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx> > >>Reply-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering > >>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:26 -0800 > >>MIME-Version: 1.0 > >>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([206.53.239.180]) by > >>bay0-mc5-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, > >>15 > >>Mar 2006 13:47:38 -0800 > >>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org > >>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C0C362BD193;Wed, 15 >Mar > >>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST) > >>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (turing > >>[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 13062-08; Wed, 15 >Mar > >>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST) > >>Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org > >>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4CE272BCFA8;Wed, 15 >Mar > >>2006 16:47:37 -0500 (EST) > >>Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list amayausers); Wed, 15 Mar 2006 > >>16:47:28 > >>-0500 (EST) > >>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org > >>(Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id C48BB2BD13Afor > >><amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST) > >>Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (turing > >>[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 13036-08 for > >><amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST) > >>Received: from mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net (mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net > >>[63.231.195.113])by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail > >>Multiplex) with SMTP id 921082BCFA8for <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, >15 > >>Mar 2006 16:47:28 -0500 (EST) > >>Received: (qmail 92385 invoked by uid 0); 15 Mar 2006 21:47:28 -0000 > >>Received: from unknown (63.231.195.2) by mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net >with > >>QMQP; 15 Mar 2006 21:47:28 -0000 > >>Received: from 71-33-125-113.spkn.qwest.net (HELO embroidery) > >>(71.33.125.113) by mpls-pop-02.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2006 > >>21:47:27 -0000 > >>X-Message-Info: yilqo4+6kc5lUbif9h7BDg+A+u15HOkq4V4Z8OlT5i0= > >>X-Original-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>Delivered-To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>References: <82.3834e39b.3149c0cd@xxxxxxx> > >><001a01c6486c$047fa5a0$5002a8c0@lisabusiness> > >><4D05D38A-3878-4D06-900A-7A93D8371A4D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > >>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 > >>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 > >>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net > >>X-archive-position: 8741 > >>X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 > >>Errors-To: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>X-original-sender: lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx > >>Precedence: normal > >>X-list: amayausers > >>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at avenirtech.net > >>Return-Path: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2006 21:47:39.0163 (UTC) > >>FILETIME=[145F2EB0:01C6487A] > >> > >>What is actifeed. That's a term I haven't heard before. > >> > >>Ruth Williams lrembroidery@xxxxxxxxx > >> > >> > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Roland R. Irish III" <signman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:13 PM > >>Subject: [amayausers] Re: Lettering > >> > >> > >> > The only (and last) batch of teeshirts we did had about 9,000 > >> > stitches-a really 100% covered area-and it puckered so bad on the > >> > test we had to do double 3 oz...might as well just sewn a patch and > >> > sewn that in place! > >> > But that was before the actifeed...so when I get bored some day I'll > >> > run a test and see. > >> > So far I'm having good results with the actifeed on cheap fleece > >> > blankets, sweats, workjackets, nylon jackets, and totes...I feel the > >> > actual sewn area is 'tighter' than without the actifeed, and we see > >> > either no bobbin at all in the back, or lighter material the bobbin > >> > is pulled right up through the front-no happy medium except hats and > >> > heavy jackets and totes! Weird...and our bobbins are lasting twice as > >> > long....using more thread instead. > >> > But it looks good, sews faster, and compared to before, almost no > >> > thread breaks. > >> > > >> > Roland > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >