[TCUG] Re: Wacky Ideas - Isolated Ped Crossings
- From: "Ian Routledge" <ian-routledge@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:53:05 +0100
Graham
At a correctly operating Puffin the correct sequence of operation should be:
1) confronted with a constant flow of slow moving traffic, pedestrian
presses button
2) pedestrian sees gap in traffic
3) pedestrian crosses road
4) sensors detect pedestrian has crossed in the gap and cancels the demand.
A well set up Puffin will assist pedestrians and traffic reducing delay for
both by cancelling unnecessary pedestrian demands and only giving to
pedestrians the time they need - in many situations with lower pedestrian
flows and reasonable walking speeds this will result in a reduction of
pedestrian crossing time. A badly set up Puffin can increase delay and
frustration for drivers and pedestrians and it seems this is what you are
describing.
Getting a Puffin to work well takes a little effort but the results are well
worthwhile as a more and more authorities are confirming. DfT project UG336
is seeking to quantify the potential benefits of Puffins at a number of
sites and this information will be issued by DfT as soon as possible,
Also any idea what maximum green times are running at this site?
Ian Routledge
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Jones" <GWJones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 10:25 AM
Subject: [TCUG] Wacky Ideas - Isolated Ped Crossings
Has anyone investigated delays associated with the operation of isolated ped
crossings
Outside my old Plymouth office there is a newly installed puffin serving
relatively few peds, say 1 per minute.
Invariably, the practical operation goes something like this.
1) Confronted with a constant flow of slow moving traffic, ped presses
button
2) traffic continues to roll
3) peds get very impatient
4) ped sees gap in traffic
5) ped crosses road
6) sensors detect gap in traffic.
7) signals turn red
8) traffic stopped at empty crossing
OK this particular crossing is particularly badly programmed, but I know of
similar sites which please neither peds nor drivers. Accepting that there
are UTC issues, I wonder if stopping traffic on ped demand would not result
in a net reduction in overall delay. I have not done my sums but leaving
aside pedestrian delay, it seems a choice between delaying a few free
flowing vehicles or more slow moving ones, which soon make up the lost
ground.
Anyone done any work on this.
Graham Jones
Traffic Analyst - Somerset County Council
Tel 01823 358235
This communication is intended solely for the person (s) or organisation to
whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential
information and if you are not the intended recipient (s), you must not
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received
this e-mail in error please notify the sender and copy the message to
ICTDHelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Individuals are advised that by replying to, or sending an e-mail message to
Somerset County Council, you accept that you have no explicit or implicit
expectation of privacy.
In line with the Surveillance and Monitoring Policy, any e-mail messages
(and attachments) transmitted over the Council's network may be subject to
scrutiny.
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
