[rollei_list] Re: Rollei TLR - The History by Ian Parker

  • From: "Jeffery Smith" <jls@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:54:24 -0500

At this point, I don't have much to compare Parker to. But I did notice some
typos that should have been weeded out by any competent editor.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com
http://400tx.blogspot.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc James Small
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 8:32 PM
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rollei TLR - The History by Ian Parker


At 04:39 PM 9/5/2006, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>Parker's exact wording is "The firm Franke & Heidecke were ardent and 
>proud supporters of Hitler's National Socialist Party and I would 
>quickly hasten to add that many other German industrialists also 
>supported Hitler, and with large sums of money."
>
>One fellow from the LUG asked me how I could possible listen to music 
>conducted by Herbert Von Karajan as he was not opposed to Hitler. I 
>suppose that it is the same reason why I drive Japanese cars. I'm not 
>buying them for Japan's sake. I'm buying them for my sake.

Herbert von Karajan was an ardent and open 
supporter of the Nazi regime to the point where 
Speer and his cronies didn't trust him when using 
the two Berlin symphonies to signal the need to 
evacuate Berlin -- they had to get Bruno Walter 
to do this, but von Karajan was left in the dark 
for fear that he would denounce the mass 
evacuation to the authorities.  (They already had 
squads of folks going around stringing those they 
felt were ready to flee from the nearest 
lamp-post.)   Walter was a superb conductor and 
interpreter, but von Karajan was angelic, despite 
his demonic attraction to the Third Reich.

Parker's exuberant but false statement set out 
above is just another example of why you need to 
keep that salt-shaker at hand when using him as a 
source.  Anecdotal he is, but reliable he is not 
-- I once started listing known errors in his 
HISTORY, and this was long before Prochnow came 
on the scene.  I gave up when I reached 70 
obvious errors or so and wasn't even half-way 
through the book.   Parker is a necessary read 
but it is most dangerous to regard what he sets 
out as vital unless it is verified from other sources.

Marc



msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list



---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: