----- Original Message -----
From: "Georges Giralt" <georges.giralt@xxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 2:24 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: PMK
Jim MacKenzie a icrit :I think think there is some misinterpretation here. Ilford does suggest a method of washing using sequential changes of water but the total time is the same as for a running water wash. Kodak has a similar method but it differs from the Ilford method in that the time for each change is the same while Ilford uses short periods at the beginning, when the hypo is leaving the film rapidly, and progressively longer washes as the washing continues. Both are effective but the Ilford sequence probably uses less water.Hi !
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hagner, Andrew" <Andrew_Hagner@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 4:39 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: PMK
Other than for use with PMK, what are the advantages (if any) of an all
alkaline process for film development.
===
You need a much shorter wash and can forego a hypo-clearing agent step.
Alkaline-fixed film needs about five minutes of wash to be archivally processed, without any washing aid needed.
Jim
If you follow the Ilford washing sequence, you only need 5 minutes to was your film, without was iad, and whatever fixer you use.
Test had been done which show that washing for film is best done by frequent change of water with agitation than letting the film soak in a more or less stagnant water.
Jobo advice the same when they state that you've to wash using 30 sec. cycles in their CP processors.
And, last but not least, you SAVE water which is becoming scarse.
Enjoy
--
============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.