On 1/9/06 1:36 PM, "Bob Younger" <younger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That you have to make your digital images look like less > than high quality 'analog' images to be marketable is > ironic. (I'm not taking into account the intentional use of > grain that many photographic artists have utilized for > various effects.) I don't recall using the phrase "less than high quality" anywhere in my post. I don't equate grain with loss of quality. I don't think one process is better than the other. One is very fast, the speed of which satisfies the market I'm in. The question at hand has nothing to do with a debate over silver versus digital. I want to understand the dialog you all have about grain. Bob ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.