Thanks for explaining -- that helps me understand your preferences. I had wondered whether you liked to have NumLock on for accounting type operations instead. I think Homer Layout could be modified to toggle extended rather than Numpad keys, though I realize that may be more work than interests you if you are generally satisfied with JAWS. Jamal On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Octavian Rasnita wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:58:14 +0300 > From: Octavian Rasnita <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx> > Reply-To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > > You won't have any problems because you won't steal Freedom Scientific's > clients. > Sun probably won't have problems either, not only because they are too big, > but because at least for the moment they are not an important competitor for > FS. > > FS doesn't care for their ideas or for how much effort they put in their > products, but they care only about money, because this is the main scope of > any company. > > Octavian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jamal Mazrui" <empower@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 6:23 PM > Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > > > > Good ideas, Jim. I wonder if I'm also at risk for being sued for > > emulating the JAWS keyboard interface with my Homer Layout script! > > > > Jamal > > On > > Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Jim Dunleavy wrote: > > > >> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:16:52 +0100 > >> From: Jim Dunleavy <jim.dunleavy@xxxxxx> > >> Reply-To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > >> > >> Hi Jamal, > >> > >> I wonder if Sun Microsystems is also at risk of being sued > >> over Orca's bookmarks feature. > >> We should try to get as much bad publicity as possible for FS. > >> Maybe Groklaw would cover the story? > >> Groklaw has helped on previous occasions to find prior art in > >> cases where products bases on free software have been attacked, > >> Barracuda being sued by Trend Micro over ClamAV being a notable example. > >> It seems the point of software patents is not to protect innovation, > >> but is about a much dirtier game altogether. > >> I wasn't at all amazed by this. > >> > >> --Jim > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: Jamal Mazrui <empower@xxxxxxxxx> > >> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:21 PM > >> Subject: RE: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > >> > >> > >> > Hi Ken, > >> > I suspect you were being tongue in cheeck (and I love your sense of > >> > humor!). Although legal fights can be entertaining, I don't see how > >> > this > >> > is in the interest of blind people, forcing a company to spend money on > >> > defending against litigation rather than on R&D to improve access to > >> > mainstream software. > >> > > >> > FYI -- the patent FS claims was violated is described at > >> > > >> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fn > >> etahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%226,993,707 > >> +B2%22&OS= > >> > > >> > I'm amazed that FS thought its placemarker feature was innovative > >> > enough > >> > to patent. This seems like an example of taking advantage of the > >> > magical > >> > nature of assistive technology to the uninformed, and then trying to > >> > leverage it in questionable trade practices for corporate gain. The > >> > fact > >> > that GW was never notified of the concern while its product has been in > >> > beta with public demos strongly suggests that the aim is to damage GW > >> > economically, not actually to protect intellectual property. > >> > > >> > What do others think? > >> > > >> > Jamal > >> > On > >> > Fri, 25 Jul > >> > 2008, Ken Perry wrote: > >> > > >> > > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:43:30 -0700 > >> > > From: Ken Perry <whistler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > Reply-To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > Subject: RE: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > I say let them fight and while they are fighting I hope Saratek is > >> coding. > >> > > > >> > > Ken > >> > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared > >> > > Wright > >> > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:58 PM > >> > > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > >> > > > >> > > Hi James, Worked here just now, so I'm not sure what's at fault. The > >> long > >> > > and short is that Freedom claims GW Micro's implementation of webpage > >> > > placemarkers in Window Eyes 7 violates their patint on, I guess, > >> > > being > >> able > >> > > to have placemarkers on a webpage. They filed litigation today. > >> > > > >> > > Jared > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Jared > >> > > > >> > > James Panes wrote: > >> > > > Hi Guys, > >> > > > > >> > > > Just thought I would let you know that this page is not available. > >> > > > > >> > > > Did FS lawyers have something to do with this? > >> > > > > >> > > > Regards, > >> > > > Jim > >> > > > jimpanes@xxxxxxxxx > >> > > > jimpanes@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > > "Everything is easy when you know how." > >> > > > > >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > > From: "Jared Wright" <wright.jaredm@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:53 PM > >> > > > Subject: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > http://www.gwmicro.com/blog/index.php/all/2008/07/24/do_companies_real > >> > > > ly_compete_on_who_has_t > >> > > > > >> > > > Read it and weep, at least if seeing screen readers compete on > >> > > > their > >> > > > functionality for all our general betterment is at all appealing to > >> you. > >> > > > Jared > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > __________ > >> > > > View the list's information and change your settings at > >> > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >> > > > > >> > > > __________ > >> > > > View the list's information and change your settings at > >> > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > __________ > >> > > View the list's information and change your settings at > >> > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >> > > > >> > > __________ > >> > > View the list's information and change your settings at > >> > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >> > > > >> > __________ > >> > View the list's information and change your settings at > >> > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >> > > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> "Information in this email (including attachments) is confidential. > >> It is intended for receipt and consideration only by the intended > >> recipient. > >> If you are not an addressee or intended recipient, any use, > >> dissemination, > >> distribution, disclosure, publication or copying of information contained > >> in > >> this email is strictly prohibited. Opinions expressed in this email may > >> be > >> personal to the author and are not necessarily the opinions of the HSE. > >> > >> If this email has been received by you in error we would be grateful if > >> you > >> could immediately notify the ICT Service Desk by telephone at +353 1 > >> 6352757 > >> or by email to service.desk@xxxxxxxxxxxx and thereafter delete this > >> e-mail from your system" > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> __________ > >> View the list's information and change your settings at > >> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >> > > __________ > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind