Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again
- From: Jim Dunleavy <jim.dunleavy@xxxxxx>
- To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:58:43 +0100
Hi Jamal,
You're only at risk if you've lots of money.
--Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: Jamal Mazrui <empower@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again
> Good ideas, Jim. I wonder if I'm also at risk for being sued for
> emulating the JAWS keyboard interface with my Homer Layout script!
>
> Jamal
> On
> Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Jim Dunleavy wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:16:52 +0100
> > From: Jim Dunleavy <jim.dunleavy@xxxxxx>
> > Reply-To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again
> >
> > Hi Jamal,
> >
> > I wonder if Sun Microsystems is also at risk of being sued
> > over Orca's bookmarks feature.
> > We should try to get as much bad publicity as possible for FS.
> > Maybe Groklaw would cover the story?
> > Groklaw has helped on previous occasions to find prior art in
> > cases where products bases on free software have been attacked,
> > Barracuda being sued by Trend Micro over ClamAV being a notable example.
> > It seems the point of software patents is not to protect innovation,
> > but is about a much dirtier game altogether.
> > I wasn't at all amazed by this.
> >
> > --Jim
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jamal Mazrui <empower@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:21 PM
> > Subject: RE: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again
> >
> >
> > > Hi Ken,
> > > I suspect you were being tongue in cheeck (and I love your sense of
> > > humor!). Although legal fights can be entertaining, I don't see how
this
> > > is in the interest of blind people, forcing a company to spend money
on
> > > defending against litigation rather than on R&D to improve access to
> > > mainstream software.
> > >
> > > FYI -- the patent FS claims was violated is described at
> > >
> >
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fn
> >
etahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%226,993,707
> > +B2%22&OS=
> > >
> > > I'm amazed that FS thought its placemarker feature was innovative
enough
> > > to patent. This seems like an example of taking advantage of the
magical
> > > nature of assistive technology to the uninformed, and then trying to
> > > leverage it in questionable trade practices for corporate gain. The
fact
> > > that GW was never notified of the concern while its product has been
in
> > > beta with public demos strongly suggests that the aim is to damage GW
> > > economically, not actually to protect intellectual property.
> > >
> > > What do others think?
> > >
> > > Jamal
> > > On
> > > Fri, 25 Jul
> > > 2008, Ken Perry wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:43:30 -0700
> > > > From: Ken Perry <whistler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reply-To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I say let them fight and while they are fighting I hope Saratek is
> > coding.
> > > >
> > > > Ken
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared
Wright
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:58 PM
> > > > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again
> > > >
> > > > Hi James, Worked here just now, so I'm not sure what's at fault. The
> > long
> > > > and short is that Freedom claims GW Micro's implementation of
webpage
> > > > placemarkers in Window Eyes 7 violates their patint on, I guess,
being
> > able
> > > > to have placemarkers on a webpage. They filed litigation today.
> > > >
> > > > Jared
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jared
> > > >
> > > > James Panes wrote:
> > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just thought I would let you know that this page is not available.
> > > > >
> > > > > Did FS lawyers have something to do with this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Jim
> > > > > jimpanes@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > jimpanes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > "Everything is easy when you know how."
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Jared Wright" <wright.jaredm@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:53 PM
> > > > > Subject: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
http://www.gwmicro.com/blog/index.php/all/2008/07/24/do_companies_real
> > > > > ly_compete_on_who_has_t
> > > > >
> > > > > Read it and weep, at least if seeing screen readers compete on
their
> > > > > functionality for all our general betterment is at all appealing
to
> > you.
> > > > > Jared
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________
> > > > > View the list's information and change your settings at
> > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
> > > > >
> > > > > __________
> > > > > View the list's information and change your settings at
> > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________
> > > > View the list's information and change your settings at
> > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
> > > >
> > > > __________
> > > > View the list's information and change your settings at
> > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
> > > >
> > > __________
> > > View the list's information and change your settings at
> > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
> > >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> > "Information in this email (including attachments) is confidential.
> > It is intended for receipt and consideration only by the intended
recipient.
> > If you are not an addressee or intended recipient, any use,
dissemination,
> > distribution, disclosure, publication or copying of information
contained in
> > this email is strictly prohibited. Opinions expressed in this email may
be
> > personal to the author and are not necessarily the opinions of the HSE.
> >
> > If this email has been received by you in error we would be grateful if
you
> > could immediately notify the ICT Service Desk by telephone at +353 1
6352757
> > or by email to service.desk@xxxxxxxxxxxx and thereafter delete this
> > e-mail from your system"
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> > __________
> > View the list's information and change your settings at
> > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
> >
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Information in this email (including attachments) is confidential.
It is intended for receipt and consideration only by the intended recipient.
If you are not an addressee or intended recipient, any use, dissemination,
distribution, disclosure, publication or copying of information contained in
this email is strictly prohibited. Opinions expressed in this email may be
personal to the author and are not necessarily the opinions of the HSE.
If this email has been received by you in error we would be grateful if you
could immediately notify the ICT Service Desk by telephone at +353 1 6352757
or by email to service.desk@xxxxxxxxxxxx and thereafter delete this
e-mail from your system"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
Other related posts:
