John Shutt wrote: >> Another is to deploy lots of servers in their network, to serve >> individual neighborhoods. Just for TV content. > > Or go the next step and put a server in every home. Oh wait, > that's TiVo. But wait, John. For TiVo, or any other PVR, to work, you need to feed the thing from a broadcast network. That implies OTA broadcasters or MVPDs in the loop, yes? Broadcasting is by far the most efficient way to deliver this high quality content TECHNICALLY, but it requires all that political stuff, franchises, etc. If the TV networks themselves, i.e. the congloms, are willing to put their content on the Internet, as this article explained (and they are doing to some extent now), doesn't that change the whole equation? Now any ISP can distribute that however that ISP deems best, through their net. The article was saying that as of now, this Internet content is only going to PCs. Implying, it's not used nearly as much as it might be. Appropriately designed STBs could change that. (Or people getting used to connecting TV plasmas or big LCDs to their PCs.) The problem is "only" that heavy investment by the ISPs is needed. But the point is, it could change everything about TV content distribution, if the congloms so decide. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.