[LRflex] Re: Something somewhat different

  • From: David Simms <simmszee@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:41:26 -0800 (PST)

Hi Charlie;
I'll study up on silver. I'm also very much of an environmentalist.
Re. washing, I pour in each change of wash water (Nikkor tank), invert it 
several times, maybe let stand a bit then I allow as much to drip out as 
completely as possible. I'm assuming that the agitation will 
encourage sufficient diffusion of fix into each water change. If the ratio of 
residual fix to fresh water added is something like 1/100, then the remaining 
fix, at the end of the wash process, should be (1/100)^n where n is the number 
of wash cycles. So, if I do it 10 times then (10^-2)^10 should be the 
concentration at the end of the wash, or 10^(-20). Therefore, even with 
imperfect assumptions about complete diffusion, archival standards should be 
met. This should be good enough to last 'till the end of my days anyway and, 
after that, who the hell cares ?

Cheers
Dave




________________________________
From: Charlie Falke <chfalke@xxxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sat, December 5, 2009 11:25:55 AM
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Something somewhat different

David Simms wrote: 
Charlie;
>I wasn't aware that silver was particularly toxic, could you enlighten me ?
>I think that I've seen reference to silver recovery technology at places like 
>the Photographers' Formulary which can be accessed online.
>
>Dave
>David,
    It's in the same category as lead, mercury and cadmium, 
but so are copper and zinc.  Almost everything is toxic at 
some exposure time and dose.   In the environmental movement 
in the 70s it was thought of as similar to mercury if not worse.
There is almost no data to support or refute this, possibly 
because it's a less abundant industrial pollutant because it's 
expensive.   On the other hand huge numbers of Aerospace processes 
are being revised to eliminate Cadmium, which is being replaced 
largely by 
   At very low concentrations silver is safe and is used as a 
biocide.  This has been known for hundreds of years.  There is 
about 1ppm in Astronauts' drinking water.
   Some quacks on the Internet have been pushing it as a cure all 
at much higher doses, and there's plenty of data that this has 
nasty side effects, including turning blue.  For myself 
I like to avoid becoming data if I can.  I should maybe just do 
silver recovery and not worry about it, but that doesn't get it all,
and the groundwater here as it is is quite clean. 
   It's been rural forever and we're a thousand feet above sea level, 
and I'd hate to knowingly ruin that and poison myself in the process.
   Referring to your wash technique, do you circulate each 
batch of fresh water through a washer, or let it stand between 
changes of water?

-- 
Charlie Falke                                         _____      /\
                                                 | __/\__/------/__)
                                                 |(____\/_________/
"One test result is worth                        |    |/        `o
  one thousand expert opinions" - Wernher Von Braun   0  N4003M
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Albert Einstein------ 
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: 
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: 
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/


      __________________________________________________________________
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! 

http://www.flickr.com/gift/

Other related posts: