[PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- From: "Man Tran" <mtran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:51:10 -0700
Gary,
Checkout the "delta" value in Relative Propagation Delay, it should
serve well for package's length.
-man
________________________________
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Macindoe, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 7:44 AM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Relative prop delay
Hey guys,
It has reached the point where I have to consider the package length
when matching some nets.
I am using Relative Propagation Delay in CM, and was wondering if anyone
knows how to include the package lengths?
I thought maybe the Pin Delay columns, but they are grayed out.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Gary
Gary E. MacIndoe
PCB Design Engineer
Fort Collins, Colorado
amd.com
gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- From: Macindoe, Gary
- [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- References:
- [PCB_FORUM] Relative prop delay
- From: Macindoe, Gary
- [PCB_FORUM] Relative prop delay
Other related posts:
- » [PCB_FORUM] Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
- » [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
