[PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay

From: "Macindoe, Gary" <Gary.Macindoe@xxxxxxx>
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:35:17 -0500

Hey Man,

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

I think I'd rather have it driven from the schematic.

I'll try that as soon as our new building network teething problems are
over.

 

Regards,

Gary

 

  

Gary E. MacIndoe
PCB Design Engineer
Fort Collins, Colorado

amd.com

gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx

________________________________

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Man Tran
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:51 AM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay

 

Gary,

 

Checkout the "delta" value in Relative Propagation Delay, it should
serve well for package's length.

 

-man

 

________________________________

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Macindoe, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 7:44 AM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Relative prop delay

 

Hey guys,

 

It has reached the point where I have to consider the package length
when matching some nets.

I am using Relative Propagation Delay in CM, and was wondering if anyone
knows how to include the package lengths?

I thought maybe the Pin Delay columns, but they are grayed out.

 

Any ideas?

 

Regards,

Gary

 

 

Gary E. MacIndoe
PCB Design Engineer
Fort Collins, Colorado

amd.com

gary.macindoe@xxxxxxx

References:

[PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay
From: Man Tran

[PCB_FORUM] Re: Relative prop delay

Other related posts: