[HUG ] Re: VS: Re: AW: Re: It's a sad Hasselblad day........

  • From: "Franc Flipsen" <fujifan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:13:12 -0700

Tom,

What amazes me is that the original chrome zeiss lenses still produce an amazing image with a digital back on a 500C body. Perfection in the lens design cannot be matched. Zeiss has started to produce the old Contax lens designs for the new Canon and Nikon's to try and match the image quality but it still does not match the original Hasselblad stuff.

Franc


----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Just Olsen" <tjols@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 3:50 AM
Subject: [HUG ] VS: Re: AW: Re: It's a sad Hasselblad day........


Q.G.

All of the Carl Zeiss/Hasselblad lenses I have - and know of that others have here in Norway, are in perfect working order. My three lenses (250, 80, and 50) , which I bought myself almost 40 years ago works perfect. A friend of mine have similar series (150, 80, 50) of these shiny examples from the end of the 60 - also in perfect condition...

It is the testament to the quality of the Hasselblad gear. I think it is just a matter of time before prices will go up and the V-series gear will become collectors items.

Tom of Oslo

PS - I also have a 203FE with three lenses. Also in perfect order. But this set of gear is only 13 years old, - almost new.

> From: Q.G. de Bakker [qnu@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 2011-01-23 23:25:38 MET
> To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: It's a sad Hasselblad day........
>
> Ulrik Neupert wrote:
>
> > Hello Q.G.,
> > you know that these lenses are very old and none of them was without > > need
> > of
> > major service. My 5.6/60 mm lenses are from 1958 and 1961, the 4.0/60 > > is > > from 1962. I bought one of them in combination with a 553 ELX. For > > reasons > > far beyond me the sight of a EL.. camera lets buyers stay away from > > such
> > nice items.
>
> A 1958 60 mm would fit my 500 C from that year very well.
> So, since you have two... ;-)
>
> I am a bit puzzled about that service thing. The lenses i bought > obviously
> had had a previous life spanning some decades.
> And though i of course don't know anything about that previous life, > they > all came to me in excellent condition. The only mechanical flaw among > them > is the 'hanging diaphragm' in the 80 mm lens (it will not open > completely > for viewing at f/2.8, though it will when you fire the shutter at > f/2.8. So
> only a minor problem).
> The barrels too are very clean. They aged a bit, i.e. show that they > are not
> new, but no scratches to speak of.
> The 60 mm lenses however... Beaten up and bruised. And indeed in need > of
> major service.
>
> Could be because there are far fewer of them than of any other C lens, > and > while i could ignore the also abundant beaten up, malfunctioning > samples of > those, it's hard to find a C non-f/3.5 60 mm lens at all, let alone be > picky
> about them.
> But i am (picky). I don't want a lens just to know i own one. It has to
> work, and work properly too. And it has to look good as well. (And i > even > pass on lenses with imperial unit distance scales. Have to be metric > for
> me.)
>
>
> You're right about the EL-models. Surprisingly cheap, oftentimes.
> But i noticed there are quite a few among them that are not worth even > the > little money that is asked for them. Now if my EL-repair skills would > be a
> bit better than they are, i could have the time of my life.
>
>
> 
=============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to > your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you > subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>



=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: