> > Karl vom Dorff wrote: >> Thanks for these comments. Perhaps I'll contact Access and see what they >> say. It's probably pretty difficult to program without BeIDE. > > Hm. I know there is quite a few people around who like to use such an IDE. > However, all the apps I have ever written and all code I am writing for > Haiku is done with Pe and compiled on the command line. I believe the only > thing I am really missing is the ability to double click errors and have > the editor jump to the file/line. Maybe some more which I am ignorant > of... > anyways, to say "It's probably pretty difficult to program without BeIDE." > is distorting reality a bit IMHO. :-) In fact, for large scale projects, I > would guess a build environment such as we use for Haiku itself is much > more powerful. There is even some effort by Oliver Tappe and others to > integreate native Jamfile support for "projects" into Pe. I find that much more appealing. And IntelliSense/autocompletion would also be nice :) >That being said, IDEs on other platforms do offer > additional value, like a GUI constructor and such. This is a different > story, but I don't really see what *BeIDE* adds over a cool > makefile/jamfile engine + Pe. Comments welcome, of course! Is it my turn? :) I?m using both BeIDE and Pe but more and more I?m using Pe and Jam. For me BeIDE are simple way of having all the source files in a project with the libs that I need, you just drip the lib and the source code you like, hit CONTROL + m to build (or r to run). If it wasn?t for BeIDE I would never have started to program for BeOS and nor for Haiku. But now I'm starting to find other ways of doing the same thing. > >> Anyways, I've removed the packages in question from both of these images >> as well as applied the other suggestions. > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > -Stephan > > -- MVH Fredrik Modéen