On 06/04/2008, Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > However, just going ahead and doing it because *you* think it is ok, is not > what you should do, IHMO. Someone (ie at ACCESS) not very involved with > Haiku could completely misunderstand this (your package) as comming from > the project itself. This is the larger problem - it damages the Haiku reputation - especially if people using it start to believe that those are native Haiku applications. Haiku has no Serial Connect app (does that even work in Haiku? Surely the first serial port is currently in use by the serial debug output) There's no PackageBuilder (in fact, that should probably just go away - the last thing we need is people building more proprietary .pkg files - just because it was reverse-engineered doesn't mean it should be used in the future. It's not fair to associate that format as the "standard" for Haiku.) By including these, you're making Haiku look more complete as an OS than it really is. This is misrepresenting what Haiku is, and possibly going to lead to disappointment in the future. As an example, imagine if someone in the ReactOS community started packaging older Windows 95/98 apps (Solitaire, Pinball, Wordpad, etc.) with ReactOS and distributed it - because they worked, and ReactOS didn't have replacements for them yet. Wow, that would be a disaster. You're only getting away with this because there's nobody around that cares to call foul, but that doesn't make it right.