[geocentrism] Re: Statement of Faith
- From: Dan <danchap9@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:14:53 -0800 (PST)
Yes that is correct 100%. I'm just saying that modern versions of the
scriptures are not as reliable as the true ancient txt of Hebrew and Greek.
Especially our westernised gospel in the English language. For example the word
church. Read this:
http://illuminate10.tripod.com/churchdoc.htm
And there are many more examples. I feel that Latin has done all the damage.
A good bible I found is E-SWORD check it out here's the link. As you move your
mouse over the words the strongs references pop up in Hebrew or Greek.
http://www.e-sword.net/downloads.html
All the stars are translated in Latin. In the Latin they lead to the occult
black magic arts of astrology and astronomy and mythology which God hates. But
when you translate their names from the original Hebrew you are led to the
person who created them and hopefully find salvation in Him...So many people
worship the book instead of the person who inspired it. Like the creation
instead of the creator.
Dan.
"Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I hear what you are saying and would just add that Jesus regularly quoted and
read from the scriptures, never once contradicting any of them. The scriptures
inform us that the Sun, Moon and stars move. The scriptures say very clearly
that the World cannot be moved. In particular, then, Jesus did not contradict
this teaching. This was the point. If there were ever an instance of accepting
what Christ says, or accepting what the Bible says, then I would, of course,
adhere to Christ. There does not, though, seem to be any such conflict.
Neville.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! ? Try it today!
Other related posts:
