Some more controversial calandar stuff..and science Just the links.. with the heading... I thank Carl for sending me down this interesting path... For the non scientific among us this stuff is easy to read and follow. well worth the read. very litle theology if any. Philip Epact(Gr. épaktai hemérai; Lat. dies adjecti). The surplus days of the solar over the lunar year; hence, more freely, the number of days in the age of the moon on 1 January of any given year. The whole system of epacts is based on the Metonic Lunar Cycle (otherwise known as the Cycle of Golden Numbers), and serves to indicate the days of the year on which the new moons occur. THE CHURCH LUNAR CALENDAR This is all about the moon... http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05480b.htm Astronomy in the Bible No systematic observations of the heavenly bodies were made by the Jews. Astral worship was rife in Palestine, and they could hardly have attended closely to its objects without yielding to its seductions. Astronomy was, under these circumstances, inseparable from astrolatry, and anathemas of the prophets were not carelessly uttered. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02029a.htm Astronomy (From Gr. astron, star; nemein, to distribute). A science of prehistoric antiquity, originating in the elementary needs of mankind. It is divided into two main branches, distinguished as astrometry and astrophysics; the former concerned with determining the places of the investigation of the heavenly bodies, the latter, with the investigation of their chemical and physical nature. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02025a.htm