[geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:19:50 +0200
I confirm and agree. Thanks Paul.
- Regner
Quoting Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Jack L
> I don't think I'm wasting Regner's time -- if he chooses to, I'm quite sure
> he is capable of ignoring what I say but I take the view that it doesn't hurt
> him to know that he is not alone in the lion's den. (Not, I hasten to add,
> that I have any illusion that he needs my help).
> On the subject of wasting time, he asked for five firm affirmations of why
> your position is correct and he specifically asked for short non detailed
> responses. What we have seen so far, is long winded explanations of why
> Heliocentrism is wrong -- neither affirmative nor concise. I don't think it
> is me who is wasting time.
> Paul D
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, 18 October, 2007 6:24:05 PM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?
>
>
> Dear Paul,
> Considering the limited amount of time that Regner has said he is able to
> give this forum, your e-mail isn't helpful since your are preaching to the
> converted. I realise that the more heliocentrists that take part is more than
> welcomed, but in this case your contribution is the complete opposite of what
> he was asking. Had you not addressed it to him then I don't think it would
> have mattered.
>
> Regards
>
> Jack
>
>
> Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage.
> http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html
>
Other related posts:
