Hi All, Some comments on other members comments: Marco: "* I had a number of movies where the sharp surface focus was way at the bottom of the bar. I reported them as "bad focus" but wonder whether these were actually movies with the image sequence the wrong way around. Tavi wrote: > Marco, I agree. I suspect those movies with the sharp focus at the bottom > were actually reversed or inverted sequences. No, it just means the range of focus was bad. I've reviewed close to 700 real movies, and all of them had deepest focus at the bottom. One way to tell -- when the focus point is above the tile surface, tile irregularities/dust/etc. can appear white in the center, dark on the edges. When focus is below the surface (e.g. further from the microscope), the white centers do not occur. In other words, out-of-focus blur is assymmetric. So if the "best focus" appears at the bottom of the slider, I'd mark the movie as "bad focus". One pet peeve on the calibration movies is that after you've reviewed a hundred or more movies, you're never going to get one of these wrong. They're too recognizable since there are so few of them. And even if they were hard to distinguish from real movies, they TELL you when you've got a test movie, thus defeating the purpose of blind testing! (Most people probably don't notice this, fortunately, but for anyone with a count above 100 the specificity and sensitivity numbers no longer mean anything.) --Rob ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The FMO Mailinglist ** For information on the list, subscribe/unsubscribe info etc. go to http://home.wanadoo.nl/marco.langbroek/fmo.html ** Post messages to: fmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** list admin: Marco Langbroek, fmo-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** Message archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/fmo/ ** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------