[eyedrumartcomm] Re: show theme we discussed

  • From: maxwell sebastian <maxwellsebastian@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: eyedrumartcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:23:59 -0400

Suggestions?
On Jul 16, 2014 4:22 PM, "Lindsay Smith" <lindsaymichellesmith@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
> nothing really to add but golly do i agree about needing more female
> artists on that list..
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:34 PM, maxwell sebastian <
> maxwellsebastian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Yessssssssssss
>> On Jul 16, 2014 12:30 PM, "emma ball" <emmagineering@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> i say we call it PRE:EXISTING CONDITIONS. we're about to be in there
>>> full time.
>>>
>>> Theatrically speaking this could work kind of like a Sleep No More
>>> installation.
>>> freakonomics podcast link here: (most digestible format to explain it –
>>> imho a must know about experimental theater piece....)
>>>
>>> http://freakonomics.com/2012/09/14/fear-thy-nature-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> m
>>>
>>>  emma b
>>> —————–
>>>  emmagineering@xxxxxxxxx
>>> —————
>>>  404.576.3625
>>> —————
>>>  po box 93292
>>>  atlanta ga 30377
>>> —————
>>> http://vectornectar.com
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> message, and documents or images attached to the e-mail, by anyone else
>>> other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you have received
>>> this email in error, please delete it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 July 2014 11:58, Andy Imm <andyimm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll be downtown tonight. And pease don't forget these artists:
>>>> http://www.thesculpted.com/ Dave Greber
>>>> http://vimeo.com/goldencalves Chris Chambers
>>>>  www.meganmosholder.com Megan Mosholder
>>>> Yay!
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, July 16, 2014, Priscilla Smith <
>>>> priscillagaysmith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please don't ask anybody just yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not satisfied doing this without some opportunity for people we
>>>>> don't know having the chance to submit. I am not interested in only 
>>>>> showing
>>>>> folks we already know.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is Karen Tauches the only female artist in Atlanta? I don't think so .
>>>>> . .
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested so far (with some opinions):
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Pablo Gnecco Flux artists (they are many and from all over)- just had
>>>>> a show at 72 Marietta
>>>>> Micah Stansell - seen him a lot lately
>>>>> Stan - four "yes"
>>>>> Bernard Praz (Dali-style agglomeration with lens) - probably not
>>>>> feasible
>>>>> Karen Tauches (at least two votes "no") at least one vote "yes"
>>>>> Dennis Coburn -
>>>>> Crash Hottman -
>>>>> Maxwell (self-nominated!) :-)
>>>>> Kris Pilcher - one vote no, two votes yes
>>>>> William Massey - he's already commissioned for the big project in
>>>>> October
>>>>>
>>>>> Artists known for responding to site:
>>>>> Patton White (performance)
>>>>> Helen Hale (performance)
>>>>>
>>>>> Literary artists?
>>>>>
>>>>> Other performers?
>>>>>
>>>>> Musicians?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a perfect opportunity to do what Eyedrum claims to like to do in
>>>>> terms of working across media.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll be running this idea by other committees' folks, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm writing up the parameters, making calendar, etc., but won't have
>>>>> it ready until late this afternoon/early this evening.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could interested parties get together in the next day or so to
>>>>> plan/discuss? this evening after 9 I could do. Tomorrow after 9. Friday
>>>>> before 7, after 9 (running concessions stand to make Eyedrum some $ at 
>>>>> West
>>>>> End Perf. Arts Ctr. We could meet there)
>>>>>
>>>>> Taking care of other Eyedrum biz.
>>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to telephone if you want to.
>>>>>
>>>>> THANK YOU ALL  for being engaged. This is fantastic.
>>>>>
>>>>> xo
>>>>> p
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Andy Imm <andyimm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll let Stan know. Is there some blanket wording we want to send out
>>>>>> to get others too?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:54 AM, emma ball <emmagineering@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so that's a few worth a shot we need to contact them post haste. is
>>>>>>> there formal copy? is this something we can develop on the quick?  all
>>>>>>> parties involved need to be aware of risks and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> timeline and dates need to be established too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> m
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  emma b
>>>>>>> —————–
>>>>>>>  emmagineering@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> —————
>>>>>>>  404.576.3625
>>>>>>> —————
>>>>>>>  po box 93292
>>>>>>>  atlanta ga 30377
>>>>>>> —————
>>>>>>> http://vectornectar.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>> message, and documents or images attached to the e-mail, by anyone else
>>>>>>> other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you have received
>>>>>>> this email in error, please delete it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 16 July 2014 10:50, maxwell sebastian <maxwellsebastian@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can we get this guy?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://sploid.gizmodo.com/this-pile-of-trash-actually-hides-a-stunning-portrait-1597270614
>>>>>>>>  On Jul 16, 2014 10:48 AM, "Woody Cornwell" <
>>>>>>>> cornwell.woody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> yes stan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:40 AM, maxwell sebastian <
>>>>>>>>> maxwellsebastian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ill second Stan.
>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 2014 10:39 AM, "emma ball" <emmagineering@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> karen tauches
>>>>>>>>>>> neon workshop seafood restaurant
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> m
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  emma b
>>>>>>>>>>> —————–
>>>>>>>>>>>  emmagineering@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> —————
>>>>>>>>>>>  404.576.3625
>>>>>>>>>>> —————
>>>>>>>>>>>  po box 93292
>>>>>>>>>>>  atlanta ga 30377
>>>>>>>>>>> —————
>>>>>>>>>>> http://vectornectar.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
>>>>>>>>>>> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access 
>>>>>>>>>>> to this
>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail message, and documents or images attached to the e-mail, by 
>>>>>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>>>> else other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. If you have
>>>>>>>>>>> received this email in error, please delete it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 July 2014 10:31, Woody Cornwell <cornwell.woody@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Andy Imm <andyimm@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And this guy too ==> http://www.stanwoodard.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:57 PM, maxwell sebastian <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maxwellsebastian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean shit, for $3fiddy I'll make some fucking art! ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  On Jul 15, 2014 4:55 PM, "Priscilla Smith" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priscillagaysmith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Sunday's meeting I mentioned Grady's desire to see an art
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show that looked at the building as-is as a work of art. I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talked to him
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yesterday to try to get a better idea of what he had in mind. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have anything very specific in mind, but he did say words that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one approach would be to commission 5 or 8 artists (Grady has 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> offered to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay reasonable $350 or so, stipends) to come in and "do one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing" to some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current aspect of the building, things like lighting or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> installing one of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their works in that context.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is an outline of a plan I'm suggesting. It's totally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open for discussion. I haven't presented it to him, yet, wanted 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has to be curated and mounted quickly, as we need to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready for September and October.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Announce the project (maybe call it "Existing Conditions", a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference to contractor-speak)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell interested artists to make an appointment to walk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the space. I'd make make myself available for a 24- or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 36-hour
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get a one-page description of what they want to do,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including time-line. Emphasize using things as-is, creating a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> framework or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context or way of looking at the thing the artist wants to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> highlight more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than making major changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jury the work. Who sits on the jury?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Give a 2 or 3-day time-frame to get the work done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One weekend, provide guided tours of the exhibition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We'd ask patrons to sign a waver. Safety would be very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important, tours would be by small group and guided.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PLEASE COMMENT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this could be really neat.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need an electrician.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> p
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>      *Andy  Imm*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   *678**.667.**GLOW *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * --        678.667.4569 <678.667.4569>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      *Andy  Imm*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   *678**.667.**GLOW *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * --        678.667.4569 <678.667.4569>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>      *Andy  Imm*
>>>>
>>>>   *678**.667.**GLOW *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * --        678.667.4569 <678.667.4569>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Other related posts: