How to be a black belt validater?This is an excellent suggestion Kaitlyn. I would like to see something about necessary tools and preferred tools. For example, is ms word a necessary tool? or is Kurzweil preferred over Openbook? Can a validator validate properly using only a notetaker? I realize that this would be a difficult section because we all, obviously, prefer the tools we have on hand, and the prices for adaptive technology prohibit us from buying a whole new bunch of tools just because it seems that these are the preferred method. However, a person couldn't validate using only a text editor with a spell checker because page numbers wouldn't be maintained. I suspect that most of the early books into the collection were submitted using only a text editor. However, if a new volunteer wanted to use a text editor to validate a book they'd be out of luck. Thanks. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: My Nickels Worth To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 10:45 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] How to be a black belt validater? Ok, I am wondering if we can put together a list of things a validater can/should do to make a book a really good one for the collection. This is a sort of companion thread for the older one about being a black belt submitter.. What are some things which a validater should always do, what are things which are extras, according to bookshare's requirements, but which could really improve the book for the collection? Maybe an experienced validater could give an example of what they do with a book from downloading it off step one to uploading it for publication.. Thanks, Caitlyn