[Wittrs] Re: Linguistic Behavior: Allegations of Fallacy
- From: "Cayuse" <z.z7@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:39:34 -0000
Joseph Polanik wrote:
Cayuse wrote:
So your claim that "nothing unreal experiences"
says even less than I was giving it credit for.
I intended it to say as little as possible without actually saying
nothing at all;
But you ended up saying nothing at all.
nevertheless, it says more than you can refute.
Why should I wish to refute a statement that says nothing at all?
you say that there is experience; and, I agree.
do you say 'there is experiencing' or do you say 'there is no
experiencing'?
It doesn't matter to me whether I say "there is experience" or
"there is experiencing". My claim would remain the same --
the argument "there is experiencing, therefore there is an
experiencer" is not logically sound.
==========================================
Manage Your AMR subscription: //www.freelists.org/list/wittrsamr
For all your Wittrs needs: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
