Cayuse wrote:
Joseph Polanik wrote:
Cayuse wrote:
The after-image is part of the data of experience. There is no requirement to postulate an "experiencer" of that data.
in order to maintain the posturing that you have a rational argument you are required to answer the obvious question: given the fact that you've admitted (that there is experiencing), is there something that is experiencing or is there nothing that is experiencing? it must be one or the other; so, pick your poison; or, fold up your tent.
The "something that is experiencing" is nonsensical, so your assertion that "it must be one or the other" is mistaken.
how did you prove that "something that is experiencing" is nonsensical?are you claiming that "nothing that is experiencing" is meaningful; and, if so, how did you prove that?
Joe
--
Nothing Unreal is Self-Aware
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
==========================================
Manage Your AMR subscription: //www.freelists.org/list/wittrsamr
For all your Wittrs needs: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
