Cayuse wrote:
"There is something that experiences". There is a problem here
stemming from the linguistically grounded misconception that "I
experience, therefore I am the experiencer". Once this invalid
argument is relinquished, there is no longer any need to posit a
"something" that experiences -- all we are left with is the
unproblematic statement that "there is experience".
it sounds like you are saying that 'there is experience; therefore,
there is an experiencer' is fallacious because (according to you)
'I experience; therefore, I am an experiencer' is invalid.
that's a non-sequitor.
