I see your point , my main concern was committing funds that are simply not available , the FDC option makes sense as a compromise. Andrew Weightman Rock Hall Ltd www.rockhall.co.uk 44(0)116 230 4444 Sent from my Iphone On 12 Feb 2011, at 17:17, tagnaq <tagnaq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/12/2011 05:12 PM, Andrew Weightman wrote: >> Again, I agree why not build an array of nodes that can be scaled up or >> down as funds allow. > > > I disagree, simple because the price per MBit is bad if you buy many 100 > MBit nodes compared to one 1GBit node, but Julian Wissmann pointed that > already out. > > FDC 1GBit unmetered per MBit price: 0.3$* > vs. > Swiftway 100 MBit unmetered price: 1.2$** > > > *) I acknowledge that this not totally correct because the node won't be > able to actually relay/use 1000MBit/s, but a calculation with a more > realistic value (800MBit) is still much cheaper then 100MBit nodes: > 300/800$ = 0.375$ per MBit > > **) 89Euro/month / 100MBit = 0.89E => ~1.2$ > > I agree that 800$/month (Swiftway GBit) is to expensive given the > current financial capacities. > > I agree with Julian Wissmann to go for the FDC 1GBit option, because > 300$/month seam to be a feasible amount of money to run it long-term and > it is one of the cheapest options available. > > the main options probably are > - FDC (CZ) 1GBit unmetered 300$/month > - wait for an answer from 100tb (UK server) at least it seams that > pdqvpn was able to get a server there > - wait for an answer from evoboxes ("dedi - medium" 225GBP/month for > 1GBit unmetered "not shared") [225GBP = ~360$] > - 2host: I didn't find a unmetered option or something like 100TB > traffic on http://2host.com/dedicated.html > - stick with the cheapest 100MBit unmetered option (Swiftway) for the moment > > The main question still is: Will FDC accept a Tor Exit-Node? > > I guess Moritz is just waiting for an answer from FDC... > > >