[tor] Re: Current state of affairs regarding Torservers.net

  • From: jordan <jordan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: torservers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:43:39 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 2/13/2011 3:22 PM, schrieb tagnaq:
> On 02/13/2011 12:21 AM, jordan wrote:
>>>> Ecatel, NL, Y, ~120 euro 100mbit/s dedi, ~850 dedi 1Gbit, own data
>> center, known privacy hoster
>> would be 3.6euro/TB or 2.5euro/TB
> 
> Isn't that to expensive to be considered?
> 
>>>> Leaseweb, NL, ?, 106€ 100mbit/s, Dual-Core E2160, 4GB, 2x250GB,
>> 3.2euro/TB
> 
> Same question here.
Sure to both, but might be feasible if other options fail to live up to
promises or as fillers, when money is not enough for larger option.



> I divided the hoster list in different sections:
> - no custom whois
> - too expensive
> 
> http://www.torservers.net/wiki/hoster_list
> 
> What is the current state of 100tb.eu?
> According to the whois entry 100tb.eu seams to be LeaseWeb..


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNWFCIAAoJEBINFmKST816BsEP/2QB0w16e/Y75J8GvodfqxSj
2BIPL1MIngubQuggjegqgephUklJQmCDJiAYlfAVJDH7v/0mVvwCswgWTODlPKQ5
YEOilBmEdr86YG2P/XFaNK8TpDKWH6nfsgWE29Lp0p1CQFZJraDiiNg3DcDdMGjY
CrJvDSp+SelXSz7PTPFX8/n27/NhVHvpq5Dbneg50eGxefpkpPCnzeJ1o1vU0NHI
W0awCCXkzMf0KMqAvWfa7YjZQ65mwDJBhRuoe/6+une3RrIkZTkdNjahh35TJLsP
6pxMAxfF8oHPWAd9bByOP+Kq7+tBD3ZV0c02RLJdUciwMW+qsRBLh2YuzDvLkAWf
WmQGv6Dd1VCU1fJDz40vujvA4AVQtaRhRDNp7C/vxrYT6KiqxP3jyF48eFIo7U1e
BKeXVRCKAymCMGESyCgfk79GbKt4nwvtIL/ztCGQ9skp3C+99jP3Iov4x3XEuOVg
YkDFFKtWKoOxnhvBGw8CMb7gm6r9dntk60wEvGVw8KzzM6i4/Fza9d6+FnxafS8o
GhSW+lnePOWnV/u2xjvUqQMEgvISpv9avkgU0iUY+lL3qxHrJRIDVr23aneRsk9s
PkIpQh94xbGWOhlEejYo36vYnv9V2/DM9y05/JlBivMaLz3f1U46FVw0HwV/DGNs
qICSXb0Y2PYbdIG4Zfj+
=Jdx5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Other related posts: