[THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: "Greg Reese" <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:46:37 -0500
I have a tough time with the universal driver. it has been hit or miss for
us. Most of the time, users get get blank pages out of it.
On 9/27/07, Beckett, William (Bill) <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Along these same lines, what is the advantage of the universal driver or
> better question, enforcing universal for all printers? Obviously not having
> to install 100 drivers on your citrix box is the obvious answer but what if
> you only have a handful of drivers to worry about? Then you use universal if
> someone has say a home printer they need to connect fom the outside.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jason Patten
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
> *To:* thin
> *Subject:* [THIN] printer aggravation
>
>
> FOr the most part I love the new Universal printer, but even with that I
> am encountering various printers that do not print. Primarily I am having
> trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022.
> Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all printers,
> but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that are
> having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those
> paticular models that are giving me fits.
>
> ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should use?
> I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark T520,
> and HP laserJet 1022
>
> Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and its
> printer issues are always fun.
>
>
Other related posts:
