[THIN] Re: printer aggravation
- From: "Raffensberger, Stephen D" <sraffens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:57:43 -0400
Certainly you should take the LaserJet 1022's out back and leave them
there. They are host-based.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:35 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
So I take it the best solution is to quietly take the printers out back
and install updated drives with a baseball bat? :)
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
To: thin
Subject: [THIN] printer aggravation
FOr the most part I love the new Universal printer, but even with that
I am encountering various printers that do not print. Primarily I am
having trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022.
Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all printers,
but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that
are having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those
paticular models that are giving me fits.
ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should use?
I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark T520,
and HP laserJet 1022
Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and its
printer issues are always fun.
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you
may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the message. Thank you.
Other related posts:
