Interesting. I was getting nowhere with the UPD and actually saw reference to using the HP LaserJet 1100(MS) for printing On 10/1/07, Jan <tinybeetle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > According to HP's web site this is a host based printer. The only thing > that has a chance of working is the UPD. > > http://www.shopping.hp.com/shopping/data_sheet/q5912a.html > > > On 10/1/07, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > What driver does everyone use for the HP LaserJet 1022? Off brian > > Madden site I used the HP LaserJet 1100(MS). but the printer still did not > > print > > > > On 10/1/07, Angus Macdonald <Angus.Macdonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I'm pretty sure Thinprint is explicitly supported by HP terminals so > > > I'll look down that route. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]*On > > > Behalf Of *Russell Robertson > > > *Sent:* 01 October 2007 09:18 > > > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation > > > > > > Someone else mentioned ThinPrint and we used this precisely to reduce > > > the size of print jobs. We were getting A3 CAD drawings printing out over > > > a > > > satellite link down to 15 seconds or so. Before ThinPrint, they were > > > taking > > > minutes to print. > > > > > > > > > > > > Haven't looked at it for a while though, I think there are lots of new > > > features in the app. > > > > > > > > > > > > Russell > > > > > > Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | W:www.virtualstream.co.uk | > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > *On Behalf Of *Jason Patten > > > *Sent:* 28 September 2007 15:14 > > > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I did some testing with Screwdrivers awhile back and it didnt > > > work right with our check printing solution. As far as the size of spool > > > jobs It really hasn't been an issue overall as far as I can tell. Our > > > apps > > > primarily use active reports or unfortunately Crystal reports to generate > > > the documents that users print. > > > > > > On 9/28/07, *Evan Mann* <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Amen to that. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > > > Behalf Of Landin, Mark > > > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 11:28 PM > > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation > > > > > > I endorse using Simplify/Screwdrivers. We installed it 4 years ago now > > > and never looked back. We've got HP's, Xerox multifunctions, Lexmarks, > > > and who knows what else out in the remote locations. It's been nothing > > > > > > but smooth for us! > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of anthonyabraham@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Sent: Thu 9/27/2007 8:54 PM > > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation > > > > > > For those who use the universal driver, how do you guys get around > > > large > > > spool files going over your WAN (assuming the Print Server and Citrix > > > Servers are across the WAN from your clients). We've had issues where > > > PDF files spool to 150Mb and you can imagine the issues this causes as > > > > > > it traverses over a WAN. > > > > > > We are looking at using Screwdrivers or possibly using the Universal > > > Driver with an indirect Printer Policy to get around this. > > > > > > Has anyone else experienced this issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Raffensberger, Stephen D" <sraffens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: > > > thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > 28 Sep 2007 01:00 Mail Size: 16981 > > > > > > Please respond to > > > thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > To > > > < thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > cc > > > > > > Subject > > > [THIN] Re: printer aggravation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Our Ref > > > > > > Your Ref > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Certainly you should take the LaserJet 1022?s out back and leave them > > > there. They are host-based. > > > > > > > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > > > Behalf Of Jason Patten > > > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:35 AM > > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation > > > > > > So I take it the best solution is to quietly take the printers out > > > back > > > and install updated drives with a baseball bat? :) > > > > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > > > Behalf Of Jason Patten > > > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM > > > To: thin > > > Subject: [THIN] printer aggravation > > > > > > > > > FOr the most part I love the new Universal printer, but even with > > > that > > > I > > > am encountering various printers that do not print. Primarily I am > > > having > > > trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022. > > > Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all > > > printers, > > > but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that > > > are > > > having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those > > > paticular models that are giving me fits. > > > > > > ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should > > > use? > > > I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark > > > T520, > > > and HP laserJet 1022 > > > > > > Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and > > > its > > > printer issues are always fun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This message contains information which may be confidential and > > > privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for > > > > > > the > > > addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or > > > any > > > information contained in the message. If you have received the message > > > in > > > error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy > > > > > > the > > > message. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > ****************************************************************** > > > This message originated from the Internet. Its originator may or > > > may not be who they claim to be and the information contained in > > > the message and any attachments may or may not be accurate. > > > ****************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************ > > > HSBC Bank Australia Limited > > > ABN 48 006 434 162 AFSL 232595 > > > > > > Head Office: > > > Level 32, HSBC Centre > > > 580 George Street, Sydney > > > NSW Australia 2000 > > > ************************************************************ > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > ******************************************************************* > > > This e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. > > > If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose > > > or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error, > > > please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the > > > sender immediately by return e-mail. > > > > > > Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, > > > secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability > > > for any errors or omissions. > > > ******************************************************************* > > > "SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!" > > > > > > ************************************************ > > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > > > ************************************************ > > > ************************************************ > > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: > > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin > > > ************************************************ > > > > > > > > > > > > Gallai'r e-bost yma gynnwys gwybodaeth gyfrinachol a/neu ddeunydd > > > hawlfraint. Os ydych chi'n meddwl eich bod wedi derbyn yr e-bost yma drwy > > > gamgymeriad rydym yn ymddiheuro am hyn; peidiwch os gwelwch yn dda â > > > datgelu, anfon ymlaen, printio, copïo na dosbarthu gwybodaeth yn yr e-bost > > > yma na gweithredu mewn unrhyw fodd drwy ddibynnu ar ei gynnwys: gwaherddir > > > gwneud hynny'n gyfan gwbl a gallai fod yn anghyfreithlon. Rhowch wybod i'r > > > anfonwr fod y neges yma wedi mynd ar goll cyn ei dileu. > > > > > > Mae unrhyw safbwynt neu farn a gyflwynir yn eiddo i'r awdur ac nid > > > ydynt o anghenraid yn cynrychioli safbwynt neu farn Ymddiriedolaeth GIG > > > Gogledd Orllewin Cymru. > > > > > > Gallai cynnwys yr e-bost yma gael ei ddatgelu i'r cyhoedd o dan Gôd > > > Bod yn Agored y GIG neu Ddeddf Rhyddid Gwybodaeth 2000. Nid oes modd > > > gwarantu cyfrinachedd y neges ac unrhyw ateb. > > > > > > Bydd y neges yma ac unrhyw ffeiliau cysylltiedig wedi cael eu gwirio > > > gan feddalwedd canfod firws cyn eu trosglwyddo. Ond rhaid i'r sawl sy'n > > > derbyn wirio rhag firws ei hun cyn agor unrhyw ymgysylltiad. Nid yw'r > > > Ymddiriedolaeth yn derbyn unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am unrhyw golled neu niwed a > > > allai gael ei achosi gan firws meddalwedd. > > > > > > > > > > > > This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright > > > material. If you believe that you have received this e-mail in error > > > please > > > accept our apologies; please do not disclose, forward, print, copy or > > > distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on > > > its > > > contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please > > > inform > > > the sender that this message has gone astray before deleting it. > > > > > > Any views or opinions presented are to be understood as those of the > > > author and do not necessarily represent those of the North West Wales NHS > > > Trust. > > > > > > The contents of this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under > > > the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The > > > confidentiality of the message and any reply cannot be guaranteed. > > > > > > This message and any attached files will have been checked with virus > > > detection software before transmission. However, recipients must carry out > > > their own virus checks before opening any attachment. The Trust accepts no > > > liability for any loss or damage, which may be caused by software viruses. > > > > > > > > >