[THIN] Re: printer aggravation

  • From: "Jason Patten" <jasoncitrix@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:23:15 -0400

Interesting. I was getting nowhere with the UPD and actually saw reference
to using the HP LaserJet 1100(MS) for printing

On 10/1/07, Jan <tinybeetle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> According to HP's web site this is a host based printer. The only thing
> that has a chance of working is the UPD.
>
> http://www.shopping.hp.com/shopping/data_sheet/q5912a.html
>
>
> On 10/1/07, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > What driver does everyone use for the HP LaserJet 1022?  Off brian
> > Madden site I used the HP LaserJet 1100(MS). but the printer still did not
> > print
> >
> > On 10/1/07, Angus Macdonald <Angus.Macdonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >  I'm pretty sure Thinprint is explicitly supported by HP terminals so
> > > I'll look down that route.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]*On
> > > Behalf Of *Russell Robertson
> > > *Sent:* 01 October 2007 09:18
> > > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> > >
> > >  Someone else mentioned ThinPrint and we used this precisely to reduce
> > > the size of print jobs. We were getting A3 CAD drawings printing out over 
> > > a
> > > satellite link down to 15 seconds or so. Before ThinPrint, they were 
> > > taking
> > > minutes to print.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Haven't looked at it for a while though, I think there are lots of new
> > > features in the app.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Russell
> > >
> > > Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | W:www.virtualstream.co.uk |
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > *On Behalf Of *Jason Patten
> > > *Sent:* 28 September 2007 15:14
> > > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well I did some testing with Screwdrivers awhile back and it didnt
> > > work right with our check printing solution. As far as the size of spool
> > > jobs It really hasn't been an issue overall as far as I can tell.  Our 
> > > apps
> > > primarily use active reports or unfortunately Crystal reports to generate
> > > the documents that users print.
> > >
> > >  On 9/28/07, *Evan Mann* <emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Amen to that.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > > Behalf Of Landin, Mark
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 11:28 PM
> > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> > >
> > > I endorse using Simplify/Screwdrivers. We installed it 4 years ago now
> > > and never looked back. We've got HP's, Xerox multifunctions, Lexmarks,
> > > and who knows what else out in the remote locations. It's been nothing
> > >
> > > but smooth for us!
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of anthonyabraham@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Sent: Thu 9/27/2007 8:54 PM
> > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> > >
> > > For those who use the universal driver, how do you guys get around
> > > large
> > > spool files going over your WAN (assuming the Print Server and Citrix
> > > Servers are across the WAN from your clients).  We've had issues where
> > > PDF files spool to 150Mb and you can imagine the issues this causes as
> > >
> > > it traverses over a WAN.
> > >
> > > We are looking at using Screwdrivers or possibly using the Universal
> > > Driver with an indirect Printer Policy to get around this.
> > >
> > > Has anyone else experienced this issue?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Raffensberger, Stephen D" <sraffens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by:
> > > thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 28 Sep 2007 01:00 Mail Size: 16981
> > >
> > > Please respond to
> > > thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > > < thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > cc
> > >
> > > Subject
> > > [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Our Ref
> > >
> > > Your Ref
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Certainly you should take the LaserJet 1022?s out back and leave them
> > > there. They are host-based.
> > >
> > >
> > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > > Behalf Of Jason Patten
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 10:35 AM
> > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [THIN] Re: printer aggravation
> > >
> > > So I take it the best solution is to quietly take the printers out
> > > back
> > > and install updated drives with a baseball bat?  :)
> > >
> > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > > Behalf Of Jason Patten
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM
> > > To: thin
> > > Subject: [THIN] printer aggravation
> > >
> > >
> > > FOr the most part  I love the new Universal printer, but even with
> > > that
> > > I
> > > am encountering various printers that do not print.  Primarily I am
> > > having
> > > trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022.
> > > Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all
> > > printers,
> > > but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that
> > > are
> > > having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those
> > > paticular models that are giving me fits.
> > >
> > > ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should
> > > use?
> > > I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark
> > > T520,
> > > and HP laserJet 1022
> > >
> > > Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and
> > > its
> > > printer issues are always fun.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This message contains information which may be confidential and
> > > privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for
> > >
> > > the
> > > addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or
> > > any
> > > information contained in the message. If you have received the message
> > > in
> > > error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy
> > >
> > > the
> > > message. Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ******************************************************************
> > > This message originated from the Internet. Its originator may or
> > > may not be who they claim to be and the information contained in
> > > the message and any attachments may or may not be accurate.
> > > ******************************************************************
> > >
> > >
> > > ************************************************************
> > > HSBC Bank Australia Limited
> > > ABN 48 006 434 162       AFSL 232595
> > >
> > > Head Office:
> > > Level 32, HSBC Centre
> > > 580 George Street, Sydney
> > > NSW Australia 2000
> > > ************************************************************
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > > *******************************************************************
> > > This e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged.
> > > If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose
> > > or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error,
> > > please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the
> > > sender immediately by return e-mail.
> > >
> > > Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely,
> > > secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability
> > > for any errors or omissions.
> > > *******************************************************************
> > > "SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!"
> > >
> > > ************************************************
> > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > > ************************************************
> > > ************************************************
> > > For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> > > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> > > //www.freelists.org/list/thin
> > > ************************************************
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Gallai'r e-bost yma gynnwys gwybodaeth gyfrinachol a/neu ddeunydd
> > > hawlfraint. Os ydych chi'n meddwl eich bod wedi derbyn yr e-bost yma drwy
> > > gamgymeriad rydym yn ymddiheuro am hyn; peidiwch os gwelwch yn dda â
> > > datgelu, anfon ymlaen, printio, copïo na dosbarthu gwybodaeth yn yr e-bost
> > > yma na gweithredu mewn unrhyw fodd drwy ddibynnu ar ei gynnwys: gwaherddir
> > > gwneud hynny'n gyfan gwbl a gallai fod yn anghyfreithlon. Rhowch wybod i'r
> > > anfonwr fod y neges yma wedi mynd ar goll cyn ei dileu.
> > >
> > > Mae unrhyw safbwynt neu farn a gyflwynir yn eiddo i'r awdur ac nid
> > > ydynt o anghenraid yn cynrychioli safbwynt neu farn Ymddiriedolaeth GIG
> > > Gogledd Orllewin Cymru.
> > >
> > > Gallai cynnwys yr e-bost yma gael ei ddatgelu i'r cyhoedd o dan Gôd
> > > Bod yn Agored y GIG neu Ddeddf Rhyddid Gwybodaeth 2000. Nid oes modd
> > > gwarantu cyfrinachedd y neges ac unrhyw ateb.
> > >
> > > Bydd y neges yma ac unrhyw ffeiliau cysylltiedig wedi cael eu gwirio
> > > gan feddalwedd canfod firws cyn eu trosglwyddo. Ond rhaid i'r sawl sy'n
> > > derbyn wirio rhag firws ei hun cyn agor unrhyw ymgysylltiad. Nid yw'r
> > > Ymddiriedolaeth yn derbyn unrhyw gyfrifoldeb am unrhyw golled neu niwed a
> > > allai gael ei achosi gan firws meddalwedd.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright
> > > material. If you believe that you have received this e-mail in error 
> > > please
> > > accept our apologies; please do not disclose, forward, print, copy or
> > > distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on 
> > > its
> > > contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please 
> > > inform
> > > the sender that this message has gone astray before deleting it.
> > >
> > > Any views or opinions presented are to be understood as those of the
> > > author and do not necessarily represent those of the North West Wales NHS
> > > Trust.
> > >
> > > The contents of this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under
> > > the NHS Code of Openness or the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The
> > > confidentiality of the message and any reply cannot be guaranteed.
> > >
> > > This message and any attached files will have been checked with virus
> > > detection software before transmission. However, recipients must carry out
> > > their own virus checks before opening any attachment. The Trust accepts no
> > > liability for any loss or damage, which may be caused by software viruses.
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Other related posts: