I have found wth MICR and HP laserjets to run them all as an HP Laserjet 4 Plus. I actually setup a second queue just for check writing that points to the same port but with that driver. Works out very well. My biggest problem printer is the HP Deskjet 6122. I only have problems with HP drivers. Canon, Oki, Lexmark have given me zero trouble. Oki printers are still my favorite. On 9/27/07, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Wow I guess I didn't realize how good I had it... ANd here I was > complaining about 2-3 types of printers that are proving to be real > headaches. Though I have noticed the PCL6 drivers on the HP laserJets are > proving to be a pain in the rear. I try and get the users to switch over > to PS drivers as much as possible. Though when they do for some reason on > our check writer module the MICR line gets moved down one line and causes > problems with the banks. > > > On 9/27/07, Jensen, Jay <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Lucky dog!! We have multi-functional printers (Xerox) that are a Print > > Driver nightmare! One thing I have found out is never install a Xerox PCL > > printer driver. Use only PS print drivers with Xerox and make sure the > > driver has been cleared by Xerox in Terminal Server / Citrix as a good > > printer otherwise(test first-don't believe them), major > > headaches/problems….I'm getting sick!!! :J > > > > > > > > *Jay * > > *TCS Americas Technology - La Crosse* > > *Citrix Server Team* > > ------------------------------ > > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > > Behalf Of *Jason Patten > > *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:49 AM > > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: printer aggravation > > > > > > > > well for us its a great thing because we don't have to worry about > > aliasing a few hundred types of printers. Our client base is entirely > > remote PC's stationed in hotel back offices or at various management company > > offices, It is extremely heterogeneous. Not having to worry about drivers > > and getting as close to plug-n-print as we can simplifies our support life > > immensely. > > > > On 9/27/07, *Beckett, William (Bill)* <WBECKETT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Along these same lines, what is the advantage of the universal driver or > > better question, enforcing universal for all printers? Obviously not having > > to install 100 drivers on your citrix box is the obvious answer but what if > > you only have a handful of drivers to worry about? Then you use universal if > > someone has say a home printer they need to connect fom the outside. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > > Behalf Of *Jason Patten > > *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:27 AM > > *To:* thin > > *Subject:* [THIN] printer aggravation > > > > FOr the most part I love the new Universal printer, but even with that > > I am encountering various printers that do not print. Primarily I am having > > trouble with various Lexmark printers and the HP LaserJet 1022. > > Currently by citrix policy I enforce universal driver for all printers, > > but I am looking at creating an exemption policy for those users that are > > having trouble with printing and trying to setup a mapping for those > > paticular models that are giving me fits. > > > > ANy ideas on the best way to go about that or what drivers I should use? > > I know currently there are issues with the Lexmark X3550, Lexmark T520, > > and HP laserJet 1022 > > > > Of course I also have issues with various users running Mcaffee and its > > printer issues are always fun. > > > > > > > > > >