Hi Matt, I didn't write they would not, I did write that they wer not at the time I wrote it. Whether they are now, I don't know, but they are certainly not ruling it out for ever as far as I know. Touch screens are tricky and you have to get the interface right, or it is clumsy. All the best Steve -----Original Message----- From: talks-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:talks-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt Brown Sent: Tuesday 30 June 2009 19:47 To: talks-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [talks-uk] Re: APPLE I PHONE Steve, you yourself wrote in a message that Nuance would not develop for the N97 because it is a 5th addition phone and that they would be waiting for more such phones to come out in the future. You also mentioned the touch screen as a reason why they wouldn't. I based my comments on what you wrote, and as a licensed distributer of the talks product with a direct line to Nuance, I would assume you would be in a position to know. Matt -------------------------------------------------- From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:40 PM To: <talks-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [talks-uk] Re: APPLE I PHONE > Hi Matt, > > So you know that Nuance are not developing for the N97 do you? That's more > than I know, and probably not true. > > All the best > > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: talks-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:talks-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Matt Brown > Sent: Tuesday 30 June 2009 19:37 > To: talks-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [talks-uk] Re: APPLE I PHONE > > Well Steve, at the moment, I think talks is in danger of falling behind > the > times with access, so I'd say anything that offers an alternative is > encouraging, even if it isn't perfect yet. Even Mobile speak is way ahead > of > > talks now as far as supported handsets go! I'm getting increasingly > worried > about the fact that Nokia seem to be bringing out an ever increasing > number > of touch screen handsets like the new and fantastic N97, but Nuance in > their > > wisdom does not feel the N97 is worth developing support for! I think > that's > > total bunk! Its the most amazing phone I've ever seen, with a completely > accessible qwerty keyboard that's nicely laid out and easy to navigate, > great sound, nice comfortable shape, very powerful multi-media features, a > massive 32 GB harddrive for all those audio books we blinks love to store > on > > our phones which can be increased to 48 GB with a 16 GB micro SD card, > good > camera, GPS, and many more features, but Nuance isn't interested! I'm very > disappointed to say the least, because that phone rips the IPhone to > pieces, > > but because its 5th addition and has a touch screen, Nuance doesn't want > to > know, despite the fact that Nuance could jiggle with the OS to make the > touch screen completely redundant very easily. In fact, almost everything > can be done from the keyboard already, navigation, text and number entry > etc. The only things you can't do are answer or end a call and exit out of > submenus or aps. However those things are very easily fixed! > > So as the World moves towards touch phones, I for one am very interested > in > anything that makes touch screens accessible. No I may not rush out > tomorrow > > and buy an IPhone, but I'm watching and listening with interest never the > less, because Nokia is moving in that direction too. > > In fact, I really hope there are some Nuance people on this list or that > someone will pass this along because I think its very important they look > seriously at the N97 and come up with something pretty quickly to enable > us > to use it. Its the next major step for us phonewise, far more powerful > than > anything else Nokia plans to release for the foreseeable future (and that > includes the N86). > > Matt > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:54 PM > To: <talks-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [talks-uk] Re: APPLE I PHONE > >> Hi Darren, >> >> Why does it make it more interesting for the adaptive tech industry? >> Let's >> see, you can't easily buy it other than on O2. You can't easily buy it >> unlocked. Unless you have a contract, it costs a fortune. The battery >> life >> is poor. The podcast client doesn't even let you download podcasts over >> the >> air. In fact I would say it's a pretty poor phone, and I haven't even >> seen >> it. >> >> Long live Talks! >> >> All the best >> >> Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: talks-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:talks-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of Darren Harris >> Sent: Tuesday 30 June 2009 18:39 >> To: talks-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [talks-uk] Re: APPLE I PHONE >> >> Yup voice over is working and I know someone who uses it and they can't >> sing it's prazes enough. Very accessible I'm hearing. That should make >> things interesting for the adaptive tech industry as a whole now. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: talks-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:talks-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt Brown >> Sent: 30 June 2009 18:24 >> To: talks-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [talks-uk] Re: APPLE I PHONE >> >> >> Funny enough I've just been having a discussion about this very thing. >> Apparently voiceover is now ready and working on the IPhone. Apple told >> me >> that wouldn't happen until the end of Q3 this year, but obviously things >> >> moved along a bit quicker. As far as I know, Talks does not work on the >> IPhone. >> >> Matt >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "alprit" <alprit@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:15 PM >> To: <talks-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [talks-uk] APPLE I PHONE >> >>> Hi >>> >>> I've heard on the grapevine that Talks now works with the I phone. >>> Can anyone confirm this to be true? >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Pritesh and Alpa Thakore >>> E-mail: alprit@xxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Skype name: alprit5 >>> MSN: pritalpa@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> >>> >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>> signature database 4169 (20090619) __________ >>> >>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>> >>> http://www.eset.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature database 4169 (20090619) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2209 - Release Date: >> 06/30/09 11:37:00 >> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2209 - Release Date: >> 06/30/09 11:37:00 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature database 4169 (20090619) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature > database 4169 (20090619) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4169 (20090619) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4169 (20090619) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com