[SS2S-Main] Re: Interesting Motor-Design Documents

  • From: vicente Alvero Zambrano <vicente_alvero_14@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "sugarshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sugarshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:18:17 +0100

What kind of help with the instrumentation?
From: vicente_alvero_14@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: rickmaschek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [SS2S-Main] Re: Interesting Motor-Design Documents
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:17:40 +0100

What kind of help with the instrumentation?
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:15:04 -0800
From: rickmaschek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [SS2S-Main] Re: Interesting Motor-Design Documents
To: vicente_alvero_14@xxxxxxxxxxx

I already am building one for another sugar project, was going to suggest it 
for SS2S if it works.

From: vicente Alvero Zambrano <vicente_alvero_14@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "sugarshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sugarshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 8:10 AM
Subject: [SS2S-Main] Re: Interesting Motor-Design Documents

that would be great, why not try.?

> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:54:39 -0600> Subject: [SS2S-Main] Re: Interesting 
> Motor-Design Documents> From: richard.rocketry@xxxxxxxxx> To: 
> sugarshot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Interesting suggestion, Jeff. I am not aware of 
> any sugar motor that> has ever used an aerospike nozzle.> > As Bill pointed 
> out, the fact that a large percentage of the exhaust> is condensed phase 
> (44%, to be exact), may result in reduced> performance compared to a regular 
> nozzle. But might be worth> investigating. Perhaps some testing can be done 
> with the new> experimental VIC-2 motor...which is intended for 
> "miscellaneous" type> experimentation.> > Richard> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014
 at 8:10 PM, Jeff Moore <tnetcenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:> >> > I'm wondering if 
any consideration has been given to the use of aerospike> > nozzles in our 
endeavors? Seems to me that there is a significant> > performance bump using 
this nozzle design as well as a significant reduction> > of base drag. I doubt 
if anyone has used an aerospike nozzle on a sugar> > motor either - we'd be 
breaking new ground!> >> > Might be worthwhile to take a closer look at!> >> > 
Jeff Moore> > Bend, Oregon> >> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:24 AM, 
<monsieurboo@xxxxxxx> wrote:> >>> >> After reading that superb report of the 
latest static test, it
 seemed> >> appropriate to cross-post this link that just showed up on the 
arocket list.> >> Great single-page source for some document downloads on 
issues that are> >> quite topical for our current phase of development and 
testing.> >>> >> http://www.rasaero.com/dl_solid_motor.htm> >>> >> My intent in 
posting this is not in the least to be critical. Au> >> contraire, I have 
nothing but kudos for our testing program and team. This> >> is just some very 
interesting reading that's worth saving in a MOTOR_DESIGN> >> folder somewhere 
in a hard disk archive.> >>> >> "Departures from Ideal Performance", for 
example, seems relevant to our> >> quest of
 trying to maximize the performance of our <cough> inherently> >> mediocre fuel 
<cough, cough, grin>> >>> >> Enjoy!> >> Mark L.> >> DC> >>> >> 


Other related posts: