[rollei_list] Re: Who uses a T as a 'daily driver'
- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:41:02 -0500
At 07:29 PM 2/1/2010, Eric Goldstein wrote:
>OK, Marc, then feel free to refund the $150 I had to shell out to JVS
>to recement the bugger. The rear element on the T is particularly
>nasty to remove as it is riveted in. John did say that the lens was a
>very good example of a recomputer Tessar and well worth fixing, but
>like I said I don't see a difference under magnification from my 1951
>Xenar 'cord III. But then again I rarely shoot at apertures larger
>than f/8-11, so the difference may show up wider open...
As Matanle notes, the Recomputed Tessar shines
best at f/4. I do have a Rolleicord III, and the
JSK Xenar is, well, adequate, but hardly a
sterling example of the breed. The Xenars on the
later Rolleicords I used to own were no better.
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
