[rollei_list] Re: Rollei 35S, SE

  • From: marvin0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:46:11 GMT

I will concede that several people insist they are as accurate with the zone 
focus on a Rollei 35 as most are with RF on other cameras, something I am not 
and which obviously clouds my view of the 35 with its limiting zone focus
In order to answer your question Mark Rabner there would be Little point in me 
discussing the merits of the 35 if I had not tried one.
Regards,
Marvin.
Sent via BlackBerry® from 3

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:07:14 
To:<rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rollei 35S, SE


> Richard on a general level taking into account personal styles, I wouldn't say
> useless but I would say very limiting, making them a speacilist tool for
> certain types of photography static subjects and the like.
> And on a personal level depent upon my photographic preferences  I would say
> yes USELESS.
> I also don't think the 35 is a great ergonomic design a thought echoed by
> Steven Gandy on the Camera Quest website.
> Thanks,
> Marvin.
> 


Have you shot a roll with one?

Mark William Rabiner
rabinergroup.com


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 10-2007